Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in judgment (Cause commenced 30 July 2018)· [2020] KEELRC 1866 (KLR)

Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Drilling Spares and Services Ltd [2020] KEELRC 1866 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 January 2020
332 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a union's recognition claim because the employer's core business was water works, not mechanical engineering.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Kenya Engineering Workers Union sued Drilling Spares & Services Ltd on 30 July 2018 seeking recognition and an order compelling the Respondent to comply with section 48 of the Labour Relations Act. The Cause was heard on 11 November 2019, the Union electing not to call evidence while the Respondent called its Human Resources Manager. Two issues fell for determination: whether the Union was the right union to represent the Respondent's employees, and whether the Respondent had declined to comply with section 48. On the first, the Respondent showed it was classified by the National Construction Authority under civil engineering works, sub-class water works, while the Union's constitution covered employees in general mechanical engineering and metal and allied industries. The Union argued in cross-examination that borehole drilling uses casings and requires technicians and engineers, making it mechanical engineering. The Court rejected this, holding that the substratum of the Respondent's operations is the water business, so the Union was not the appropriate union for its employees. That finding rendered the section 48 compliance issue unnecessary to decide. The Memorandum of Claim was dismissed with no order on costs. Judgment was delivered in Nairobi on 24 January 2020 by Radido Stephen J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Union is the appropriate union to represent the Respondent's employees

Holding

The Union's constitution covers general mechanical and metal allied industries; the Respondent, classified under civil engineering works (water works), falls outside this constituency

Reasoning

The Respondent evidenced its classification by the National Construction Authority as civil engineering works, sub-class water works. Although drilling involves technicians and engineers, the court held the dominant character of the business determines union eligibility. The Union's claim that borehole drilling constituted mechanical engineering did not displace the substratum test. Consequently the Union lacks constitutional competence to represent the Respondent's employees.

p. 1
02

Whether the Respondent declined to comply with section 48 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

Not determined, being rendered unnecessary by the finding on union eligibility

Reasoning

Having found the Union not competent to represent the Respondent's employees, the court held it unnecessary to examine compliance with section 48. The ancillary issue fell away with the threshold finding, an application of judicial economy where a prior dispositive finding renders a second issue moot.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A union's eligibility to represent employees is assessed against the substratum of the employer's operations as classified, not incidental technical roles within the business

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the Memorandum of Claim
  2. 2.No order on costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Actsection 48
Jurisdiction invoked
Labour Relations Act, section 48 (recognition dispute jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Drilling Spares and Services Ltd [2020] KEELRC 1866 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in judgment (Cause commenced 30 July 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1866/eng@2020-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.