Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No. 1509 of 2015 (Originally Milimani CMCC No. 1418 of 2007)· [2020] KEELRC 1492 (KLR)

Boniface Mutua Kitungu v Peter Mwaura Kamau t/a Mwaura Kamau & Co. Advocates [2020] KEELRC 1492 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 February 2020
452 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a late appeal filed years after deadlines passed, confirming courts reject unexplained delays and may punish frivolous filings with costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Radido Stephen, J) disposed of a Memorandum of Appeal filed on 25 October 2019 by Boniface Mutua Kitungu, a former security officer appearing in person, against Peter Mwaura Kamau t/a Mwaura Kamau & Co. Advocates. The memorandum sought to challenge a Chief Magistrates' Court Ruling delivered on 10 August 2007 and the dismissal of the applicant's suit on 21 November 2014 in CMCC No. 1418 of 2007. The Court noted that on 15 July 2019 it had already dismissed an application seeking to set aside the orders of 21 November 2014 and the Court's own dismissal of the Cause on 28 January 2019. Examining the applicant's submissions, the Court found they were largely alien to the memorandum, consisting of his personal exploits and achievements as a student and employee, rather than the issues raised. Revisiting the record, the Court held that the complaints in the memorandum had been extensively discussed in the 15 July 2019 Ruling and there were no valid proceedings before it. On the possibility that the applicant was seeking leave to appeal out of time, the Court found no plausible reason for his failure to appeal within the statutorily prescribed timelines. To deter frivolous and vexatious filings, the Court dismissed the Memorandum of Appeal with costs of Kshs 2,000/- to the Respondent, represented by Mr. Momanyi of Gachoka & Co. Advocates.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Memorandum of Appeal had merit

Holding

Dismissed; the complaints were already dealt with in the Court's Ruling of 15 July 2019 and the submissions were alien to the memorandum

Reasoning

The Court revisited the record and found the applicant's submissions addressed matters unrelated to the memorandum, consisting of his personal exploits as a student and security officer. The complaints raised had been extensively addressed in the earlier Ruling of 15 July 2019, which had dismissed an application to set aside the orders of 21 November 2014 and the dismissal of the Cause on 28 January 2019. There were no valid proceedings before the Court.

p. 1
02

Whether leave to appeal out of time could be granted

Holding

Refused; no plausible reason was offered for the delay in appealing within the prescribed timelines

Reasoning

The applicant had long been aware of the dismissal of his suit yet filed the memorandum only on 25 October 2019. The Court found no plausible reason for the failure to appeal within the timelines prescribed under the applicable statutory regime, and treated the memorandum as frivolous and vexatious, dismissing it with costs as a deterrent.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal filed out of the statutorily prescribed time requires a plausible explanation for the delay; absent one, leave to appeal out of time will be refused
  • Courts may dismiss frivolous and vexatious applications with costs to deter abuse of process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Memorandum of Appeal filed in Court on 25 October 2019 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of Kshs 2,000/- awarded to the Respondent
On appeal from
Chief Magistrates' Court
CMCC No. 1418 of 2007
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate/supervisory jurisdiction over appeals from the magistrates' court under the applicable statutory regime governing employment appeals

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Boniface Mutua Kitungu v Peter Mwaura Kamau t/a Mwaura Kamau & Co. Advocates [2020] KEELRC 1492 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 1509 of 2015 (Originally Milimani CMCC No. 1418 of 2007). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1492/eng@2020-02-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.