Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 2120 of 2015· [2020] KEELRC 1410 (KLR)

Jedidah Wangui v Eldon Villas Limited [2020] KEELRC 1410 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 March 2020
920 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nairobi housekeeper who left her job for a new employer lost her unfair termination case and was ordered to pay her former employer one month's salary.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent on 05.03.2010 as a Housekeeper at Kshs.12,000.00 per month on annually renewable contracts, sued for a declaration that her termination was wrongful and unfair, compensation, unused leave pay, salary for May 2015, notice pay, service pay, general damages, a certificate of service, costs and interest. The respondent denied the claim, asserting the claimant absconded duty in May 2015 before her contract lapsed, and counterclaimed for notice pay of Kshs.12,000.00. The court framed three issues: existence of a contract of service; whether the employment was terminated or the claimant absconded; and entitlement to the remedies sought. The court found the contract of service undisputed. On the evidence, it preferred the respondent's account, holding that the claimant left employment on 28.04.2015 to take up new employment with Bidwood Apartment Limited, which she admitted in cross-examination, and that she provided no medical reports to verify the alleged serious illness of her child. The unfair termination allegations collapsed and the counterclaim was allowed. All ancillary claims failed: leave had been granted per the leave forms; the May 2015 salary claim was dishonest as she admitted not working that month; service pay was barred by section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007 as she was an NSSF member; and the notice pay claim was unjust enrichment. Judgment was entered for the respondent: the claimant to pay Kshs.12,000.00 by 01.05.2020, failing which interest at court rates from filing until full payment, plus the respondent's costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of a contract of service

Holding

The parties were in a contract of service; the claimant was employed as a Housekeeper on 05.03.2010 at Kshs.12,000.00 per month

Reasoning

There was no dispute between the parties that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a Housekeeper from 05.03.2010 at a monthly salary of Kshs.12,000.00. The contracts were renewable on an annual basis. This finding disposed of the first issue.

p. 1
02

Whether employment was terminated or the claimant absconded

Holding

The claimant absconded duty to take up new employment with Bidwood Apartment Limited; the respondent's counterclaim for notice pay was allowed

Reasoning

The court preferred the employer's evidence that the claimant absconded in May 2015 before her contract lapsed and started working for Bidwood Apartments Limited on 05.05.2015, which she admitted in cross-examination. No medical reports verified the alleged serious illness of her child. The unfair termination allegations collapsed and the counterclaim for Kshs.12,000.00 notice pay was allowed.

p. 2
03

Entitlement to ancillary remedies

Holding

All ancillary claims failed

Reasoning

Leave had been given as per the leave forms on record; the claim for May 2015 salary was dishonest as the claimant admitted she did not work that month; service pay was unavailable because the claimant was an NSSF member under section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007; and the notice pay claim was unjust enrichment since the claimant did not give or earn notice.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee who is a member of NSSF is not entitled to service pay under section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007
  • A claimant alleging unfair termination bears the evidential burden of supporting the claim; unsupported allegations collapse

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claimant to pay the respondent Kshs.12,000.00 by 01.05.2020 failing interest to be payable thereon at court rates from the date of filing the suit till full payment
  2. 2.The claimant to pay the respondent's costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007section 35
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (specific constitutional/statutory provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jedidah Wangui v Eldon Villas Limited [2020] KEELRC 1410 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No 2120 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1410/eng@2020-03-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.