Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedStatement of Claim dated 15th December 2017· [2020] KEELRC 1203 (KLR)

Kenya Shoe Leather Workers Union v Fast Track Management Consultants Limited [2020] KEELRC 1203 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
23 April 2020
2,359 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court awarded workers a 5% pay rise and leave allowance but kept annual leave at the statutory 21 days, following the Ministry of Labour's economic report.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a trade union representing employees in the leather industry, filed a Statement of Claim on 15th December 2017 seeking the Court's determination of three disputed issues in the negotiations of its third Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Respondent, an outsourcing human resource company, covering 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018: annual leave, leave travelling allowance and wage increments. The parties held a valid Recognition Agreement and CBA. After negotiations failed, the dispute was reported to the Minister under Section 62(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007; a conciliator was appointed on 14th July 2017 and the parties signed an agreement to disagree, paving the way for the Claim. The Respondent, in its defence and submissions, raised capacity objections under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act on membership numbers, challenged the CPMU report's accuracy given its outsourcing model and commission-based income, and urged retention of 21 days' annual leave per Section 28 of the Employment Act, an increase of leave travelling allowance to Kshs.2,200, and no wage increment. The Claimant aligned itself with the CPMU report, urging adoption of its proposals. Considering the CPMU report, the Wages Guidelines and the respondent's financial position, the Court awarded a 5% general wage increase above statutory minimum wages, maintained annual leave at 21 days, and awarded leave travelling allowance of Kshs.2,350. The judgment was delivered remotely at Nairobi on 23rd April 2020 in line with COVID-19 directions, guided by Articles 159(2)(d) and 48 of the Constitution and Section 1B of the Civil Procedure Act.

Key legal issues

#
01

Determination of the three disputed CBA clauses (annual leave, leave travelling allowance and wage increment)

Holding

The court awarded a 5% general wage increase above statutory minimum wages, maintained annual leave at 21 days and awarded leave travelling allowance of Kshs.2,350, adopting a middle position informed by the CPMU report and the parties' submissions

Reasoning

The court considered the CPMU report which found a 15% rise in cost of living, healthy financial performance by the respondent, and the Bata Shoe Company's compulsory 24-day maintenance closure. It balanced these against the respondent's claims of poor performance on the Bata contract, reduced commission, risk of job losses, and the statutory 21-day leave entitlement under Section 28 of the Employment Act, arriving at awards reflecting the compensable factors without unduly increasing labour costs.

p. 4
02

Whether the Claimant union lacked capacity under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007

Holding

The court did not sustain the respondent's objection on capacity and proceeded to determine the dispute on its merits

Reasoning

The respondent argued that the union had only about 70 members at filing, later dropping to 24 out of 700 employees, failing the simple majority threshold under Section 54. The court made no express finding on this objection, instead noting the undisputed valid Recognition Agreement and CBA, the Minister's acceptance of the trade dispute under Section 62(1), and the failed conciliation, thereby proceeding to determine the disputed CBA issues.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • In considering an economic dispute the court is to take into account the economic report prepared by the CPMU Department of the Ministry of Labour and the Wages Guidelines issued by the Minister for Finance
  • Major compensable factors in wage review include rise in the cost of living due to inflation and improved labour productivity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.General wage increase of 5% above statutory minimum wages
  2. 2.Annual leave to be maintained at the current 21 days
  3. 3.Leave travelling allowance awarded at Kshs.2,350

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 62(1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 54
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 28
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Actnot specified
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; trade dispute reported to the Minister under Section 62(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007 after failed conciliation

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Shoe Leather Workers Union v Fast Track Management Consultants Limited [2020] KEELRC 1203 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Statement of Claim dated 15th December 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1203/eng@2020-04-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.