Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment· [2020] KEELRC 1139 (KLR)

James Ouru Oroko v Kisii County Government [2020] KEELRC 1139 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
13 May 2020
1,208 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A dismissed Kisii County employee lost his case because he never appealed to the Public Service Commission before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The respondent, Kisii County Government, through counsel Anne Baabu, raised a preliminary objection against the claimant's suit challenging his summary dismissal on 1st February 2019 following his resignation to vie for an elective MCA seat in the 2017 general election. The objection invoked Section 87(2) of the Public Service Act, No. 10 of 2017 read with Section 77 of the County Governments Act, No. 17 of 2012, contending that a person may not file legal proceedings on matters within the Public Service Commission's appellate jurisdiction over the county public service without first exhausting the statutory appeal procedure, and that the claim was therefore premature and the court lacked jurisdiction. The claimant had been issued a notice to show cause for desertion of duty, interdicted verbally, and ultimately summarily dismissed. The dismissal letter directed him to appeal to the Secretary, County Public Service Board of Kisii - a procedure the court found to be non-existent - but he appealed neither there nor to the Public Service Commission. Relying on its own decision in Shem Okora Onywera vs Kisii County Government and another (2018) eKLR and the Court of Appeal's decision in Secretary, County Public Service Board and another vs Hulbhan Gedi Abdille (2017) eKLR, the court held that the appellate mechanism under Section 77 is the specialized first-instance forum for such grievances and that failure to invoke it rendered the suit premature. Noting that the claimant was a senior public servant who could not claim ignorance of the law, the court upheld the preliminary objection and struck out the suit for want of jurisdiction. The ruling was delivered electronically pursuant to COVID-19 pandemic directions issued by the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020.

Key legal issues

#
01

Exhaustion of the statutory appeal procedure under Section 87(2) of the Public Service Act and Section 77 of the County Governments Act

Holding

The claimant was bound to appeal to the Public Service Commission under Section 77 of the County Governments Act before filing suit; having failed to do so, the suit was premature and the court lacked jurisdiction

Reasoning

Section 87(2) of the Public Service Act prohibits filing legal proceedings on matters within the Public Service Commission's appellate jurisdiction over county public service unless the statutory procedure is exhausted. Section 77 of the County Governments Act provides the appeal mechanism to the Commission for persons aggrieved by disciplinary control. The claimant neither appealed to the Commission nor as erroneously advised by the County Secretary, and being a senior public servant, could not claim ignorance. The Court of Appeal decision in the Hulbhan Gedi Abdille case bound the court.

p. 2
02

Effect of misleading advice by the County Secretary on the letter of dismissal directing appeal to a non-existent forum

Holding

The misleading direction in the dismissal letter to appeal to the Secretary, County Public Service Board of Kisii - a procedure that does not exist - did not cure the claimant's failure to appeal to the Public Service Commission

Reasoning

The dismissal letter advised the claimant to appeal to the Secretary, County Public Service Board of Kisii within 42 days, a procedure the court described as non-existent. However, the claimant did not appeal as advised nor did he appeal to the Public Service Commission. As a senior public servant who had voluntarily resigned to vie for an elective post, he could not be presumed ignorant of the law, the maxim being that ignorance of the law is no defence.

p. 2
03

Court's lack of jurisdiction where a mandatory statutory dispute resolution mechanism has not been exhausted

Holding

A suit filed in violation of a mandatory statutory appeal procedure is premature and must be struck out for want of jurisdiction

Reasoning

Following its own decision in Shem Okora Onywera vs Kisii County Government (2018) eKLR and the Court of Appeal in Secretary, County Public Service Board and another vs Hulbhan Gedi Abdille (2017) eKLR, the court held that the Section 77 appellate mechanism is the specialized, first-instance forum for grievances arising from disciplinary control against county public officers, and a suit brought in disregard of that mechanism is filed prematurely and must fail.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A person shall not file any legal proceedings in any court of law with respect to matters within the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission to hear and determine appeals from county government public service unless the statutory appeal procedure has been exhausted
  • Where a statutory appellate mechanism exists for disciplinary decisions against county public officers, that mechanism must be exhausted before resort to the courts; failure to do so renders the suit premature and the court devoid of jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection raised by counsel for the respondent Anne Baabu is upheld
  2. 2.The suit is struck off for want of jurisdiction

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Public Service ActSection 87(2)
  • County Governments Act, No. 17 of 2012Section 77(1), (2)(c), (2)(e) and (3)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 18
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48

Cases cited (2)

  • Shem Okora Onywera vs Kisii County Government and another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Secretary, County Public Service Board and another vs Hulbhan Gedi Abdille
    (2017) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Not expressly invoked; the court's jurisdiction was held ousted by Section 87(2) of the Public Service Act, No. 10 of 2017 read with Section 77 of the County Governments Act, No. 17 of 2012

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Ouru Oroko v Kisii County Government [2020] KEELRC 1139 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1139/eng@2020-05-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.