Peter Nyamari Nyakondo v Maasai Mara University [2020] KEELRC 1095 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court temporarily blocked Maasai Mara University from retiring an employee while his legal challenge is pending.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Preservation of the status quo pending hearing of the Notice of Motion
The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo as per the letter and notice dated 3rd March, 2020, pending further directions
The court considered the claimant's application and supporting affidavit, together with the notices of retirement dated 5th December, 2019 and 3rd March, 2020, and issued interim orders preserving the position created by the 3rd March 2020 notice. The matter was then fixed for mention for further directions, the earlier mention having been overtaken by the Chief Justice's COVID-19 directions of 15th March, 2020.
Legal principles established
#- Where court operations are suspended, interim directions may be issued and served electronically on the parties
Court orders
#- 1.Both parties to maintain the status quo as per the letter and notice dated 3rd March, 2020
- 2.Mention on 30th April, 2020 for parties to take further directions
- 3.The Deputy Registrar to serve both parties with the orders and directions via email
- 4.Notice to the parties on the hearing of the Notice of Motion and the Memorandum of Claim if the mention date cannot take effect
- 5.Order to be delivered to the parties via emails in view of COVID-19 court operations restrictions
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over the employment dispute (Memorandum of Claim; Notice of Motion dated 12th February, 2020)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Peter Nyamari Nyakondo v Maasai Mara University [2020] KEELRC 1095 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 8 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/1095/eng@2020-03-30
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.