Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 238 of 2017· [2020] KEELRC 964 (KLR)

Janes Awinja Enock v Premium Cleaning & Pests Control Limited [2020] KEELRC 964 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nakuru
4 June 2020
2,735 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused an unfair termination claim because the employee ignored lawful work instructions, but still awarded her unpaid leave, public holiday and rest day pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant sued the respondent, her former employer, claiming she was unfairly terminated after refusing to sign new work targets requiring her to collect Ksh.2,000 daily at her cleaning station at Baraka Plaza. She sought notice pay, annual leave, underpayments, house allowance, public holiday pay, rest day pay, overtime, compensation, costs and a certificate of service, asserting she worked 51 months from November 2012 on 7am to 7pm shifts without leave, overtime or house allowance. The defence was that she was employed from October 2014 as a casual worker and placed on contract in January 2016 at Ksh.10,400, received wage advances, a loan and a Ksh.100 lunch/fare allowance, and that upon refusing the new targets she absconded duty, justifying summary dismissal under section 44 of the Employment Act. The court found that the claimant's refusal of lawful instructions and failure to attend work frustrated her own employment, so the unfair termination claim, notice pay and compensation failed. The underpayment and house allowance claims failed because the wages paid accorded with the Wage Orders and the conversion from casual to contract terms was lawful under sections 37 and 10. However, absent records of leave taken, the claimant was awarded annual leave of 22.5 days at Ksh.9,475.20, public holiday pay for 9 days at Ksh.6,247.38, and rest day pay for 28 Sundays at Ksh.15,603.70. Judgment was entered accordingly on 4th June 2020, with the claimant directed to attend the respondent's offices for clearance and payment, and a certificate of service to issue upon handover of work tools.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether termination of the claimant's employment was unfair

Holding

The claim for unfair termination failed; the claimant's refusal of new work targets and failure to attend work amounted to gross misconduct under section 44 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

The claimant declined to sign the new work targets and handed over part of her work tools while retaining some. The court held that even if she disputed the new targets, her recourse was not to decline lawful instructions but to communicate her concerns to the employer. Failure to abide lawful instructions is gross misconduct, and her conduct effectively frustrated her own employment rather than constituting unfair termination by the respondent.

p. 3
02

Whether the claimant was entitled to annual leave, public holiday and rest day pay

Holding

Partially allowed: annual leave of 22.5 days at Ksh.9,475.20, public holiday pay for 9 days at Ksh.6,247.38, and rest day pay for 28 Sundays at Ksh.15,603.70 awarded

Reasoning

The employer's records did not show annual leave taken or paid in lieu, so leave accrued from 5th January 2016 to February 2017. The claim of 40 days' public holiday work was an exaggeration since only 9 gazetted holidays fell in the period. Work on two Sundays each month was not challenged and was compensated as work over and above the normal hours.

p. 4
03

Whether the claimant was underpaid and denied house allowance

Holding

Both claims failed; the wage of Ksh.10,400 from January 2016 was commensurate with the minimum Wage Orders inclusive of 15% house allowance, and the conversion from casual to contract terms was lawful

Reasoning

The court found the mode of converting the claimant from casual employment (at Ksh.500 per day) to contract terms by letter dated 5th January 2016 lawful and legitimate under sections 37 and 10 of the Act. The gross wage of Ksh.10,400 matched the minimum wage of Ksh.9,020 plus 15% house allowance. Records filed by the respondent were not materially challenged.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The burden of proving unfair termination rests on the employee, while the burden of justifying the grounds for termination rests on the employer
  • An employee who declines lawful and reasonable work instructions commits gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal under section 44 of the Employment Act
  • Sections 37 read with section 10 of the Employment Act allow an employer to convert employment from casual terms to contract terms
  • The employer bears the burden of keeping work records and must file them with the court in a dispute under sections 10(6) and (7) of the Act
  • The employer must take loans and wage advances into account before payment of terminal dues under sections 17 and 19 of the Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the claimant with award of pay for public holidays of Ksh.6,247.38
  2. 2.Award of pay for work on rest days of Ksh.15,603.70
  3. 3.Award of annual leave pay of Ksh.9,475.20
  4. 4.The dues paid to abide the provisions of section 49(2) of the Employment Act
  5. 5.The claimant to attend at the respondent's offices for clearance and payment of the dues
  6. 6.Certificate of Service to issue in accordance with section 51 of the Act upon handover of work tools
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over a claim of unfair termination and terminal dues (Employment Act, 2007)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Janes Awinja Enock v Premium Cleaning & Pests Control Limited [2020] KEELRC 964 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 238 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/964/eng@2020-06-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.