Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition No 52 of 2020· [2020] KEELRC 869 (KLR)

Okoiti v Nairobi Metropolitan Service & 3 others; Badi & 9 others (Interested Parties) (Petition 52 of 2020) [2020] KEELRC 869 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
18 June 2020
7,346 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~29 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court declared the Nairobi Metropolitan Services illegally created, but gave the government 90 days to fix the problem instead of shutting it down.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, an advocate and public interest litigant, petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court challenging the creation of the Nairobi Metropolitan Services (NMS), the deployment of the 1st to 9th Interested Parties to it, and the secondment of 6,052 Nairobi City County employees by the Public Service Commission. The 1st to 3rd Respondents raised a preliminary objection on jurisdiction, arguing the matter was political and outside the Court's remit, and that the NMS was not capable of being sued. The Court framed six issues and held that it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned appointment and secondment of employees; that the Petitioner had locus standi under Article 22(1); that the NMS was not legally established since no instrument of its establishment was produced; that the deployment of the 1st to 9th Interested Parties contravened the law and Constitution as the proper deploying bodies did not state their terms; and that although there was consultation between the PSC and the County Public Service Board, the secondment of the 6,052 staff by the PSC itself was illegal, null and void because secondment of county staff is the preserve of the County Public Service Board. Applying the suspended-invalidity principle from South African and Canadian jurisprudence, the Court suspended its declaration of illegality for 90 days to allow lawful establishment of the NMS and proper secondment letters, in default of which any party could apply. It made no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC over the Petition

Holding

The Court held it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned the appointment and secondment of employees from one government entity to another and the legality of the secondment process, matters squarely within employment and labour relations

Reasoning

Section 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act confer exclusive jurisdiction over employment and labour disputes. The issues concerned 6,052 employees seconded and chief officers deployed, and the legal status of their new employer, so the disputes fell within the Court's jurisdiction despite the preliminary objection.

p. 7
02

Locus standi of the Petitioner

Holding

The Petitioner had locus standi under Article 22(1) which permits every person to institute proceedings alleging violation of rights

Reasoning

Article 22(1) grants every person the right to institute court proceedings claiming a denial, violation or infringement of a right or fundamental freedom. The objection that the Petitioner lacked a nexus to the parties he sought to protect failed, and the Petitioner as a public interest litigant had standing.

p. 7
03

Legal status of the Nairobi Metropolitan Services

Holding

The NMS was not legally established; no instrument of its establishment was presented before the Court

Reasoning

Although the President may establish offices in the public service under Article 132(4)(a) on the recommendation of the Public Service Commission, the establishment must follow the law. The Gazette Notice dated 25th February 2020 was the Deed of Transfer of functions and did not create the NMS. No instrument establishing the NMS was produced, so its legal status was unestablished at the time of filing.

p. 9
04

Deployment of the 1st to 9th Interested Parties

Holding

The deployment was done in contravention of the law and the Constitution as the proper deploying bodies did not deploy them with stated terms

Reasoning

The Court found the 1st to 9th Interested Parties were not appointed but deployed or seconded serving officers. The deployment should have been done by either the County Public Service Board or the Public Service Commission stating terms and conditions of their secondment/deployment status; this process was overlooked and contravened the law and the Constitution.

p. 9
05

Secondment of 6,052 county employees

Holding

Consultation between the PSC and the County Public Service Board took place, but the secondment by the PSC itself was illegal, null and void as it should have been carried out by the County Public Service Board

Reasoning

Evidence showed an instrument facilitating secondment signed on 18/3/2020 between the Chairpersons of the PSC and the County Public Service Board, so consultation occurred as envisaged by the Deed of Transfer. However, under Section 59 of the County Governments Act staffing matters including secondment belong to the County Public Service Board, and the PSC had no capacity to second county staff, rendering the secondment null and void.

p. 10
06

Remedies - suspension of declaration of invalidity

Holding

The declaration of illegality was suspended for 90 days to allow lawful establishment of the NMS and proper secondment, applying the principle of suspended invalidity from South African and Canadian jurisprudence

Reasoning

Comparative jurisprudence permits suspending a declaration of invalidity to allow correction of defects, guided by caution to preserve constitutional supremacy and prevent undue hardship. Since Parliament had allocated funds, staff were deployed and services were being rendered, immediate invalidation would cause confusion and loss of services to over 4 million Nairobi residents.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an entity is established without a legal instrument of establishment, it has no legal status; a public office must be established in accordance with the law with a proper instrument of establishment
  • A transfer of county functions to the national government must involve the entire county government, including the county assembly, not merely the Governor
  • The Public Service Commission has no legal capacity to deploy or second county government staff to the national government; secondment of county staff is a function of the respective County Public Service Board
  • A court may suspend a declaration of constitutional invalidity to allow a competent authority to correct the defect, guided by the need to protect the supremacy of the Constitution and prevent undue hardship

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the creation of the Nairobi Metropolitan Services was done in violation of the Law and the Constitution
  2. 2.A declaration that the deployment and secondment of the 1st to 9th Interested Parties was done in contravention of the Law and the Constitution
  3. 3.A declaration that the secondment of the 6052 staff to the Nairobi Metropolitan Services was done with consultation between the Public Service Commission and the County Public Service Board but was in contravention of the County Government Act
  4. 4.Suspension of the declaration of illegality for a period of 90 days within which the 1st Respondent should be established by law and an instrument of its establishment made
  5. 5.The issue of secondment and deployment of staff to be addressed and proper secondment/deployment letters issued by the authority responsible
  6. 6.Any party free to apply in default of compliance within 90 days
  7. 7.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 1, 1(2), 2, 3, 6(1)&(2), 10, 22(1), 23(3), 27, 36, 47(1), 73, 94(5)&(6), 129, 131(2)(a), 132(4)(a), 162(2), 174, 176(1), 179(2)(a)&(4), 187, 189, 232(1)(g), 233, 259(1)
  • Public Service Commission ActSections 27, 30, 36, 37, 42, 55(2)
  • Statutory Instruments Act, 2013Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 22(1), 23
  • County Governments Act, 2012Sections 36, 45(1)&(2), 57(a), 59, 73(4)&(5)
  • Intergovernmental Relations Act, 2012Sections 24, 25(d), 26
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2016Section 12

Cases cited (7)

  • Okiya Omtatah Okoiti v Attorney General & 2 others; Francis K. Muthaura (AMB) & 5 others (Interested Parties)
    [2019] eKLR
  • Ferdinand Ndungu Waititu Babayao vs Republic
    (2019) eKLR
  • Kenya County Government Workers Union vs Kisumu County Public Service Board and Another
    (2019) eKLR
  • Kimani Waweru & 4 Others Vs Central Bank of Kenya & 7 Others
    (2018) eKLR
  • Schachter vs Canada
    (1992) 2SCR 679, 199 CanLII 72(SCC)
  • Suleiman Shabhal vs IEBC and 3 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Milimani Constitutional Petition No. 39 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Okoiti v Nairobi Metropolitan Service & 3 others; Badi & 9 others (Interested Parties) (Petition 52 of 2020) [2020] KEELRC 869 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Petition No 52 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/869/eng@2020-06-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.