Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1049 of 2016· [2020] KEELRC 834 (KLR)

Fredrick Ouma Otieno v Falcon Signs Limited [2020] KEELRC 834 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 June 2020
1,479 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a carpenter employed by the respondent in or around 2011/2013 at a monthly salary of KES 14,240, sued for declarations that his dismissal was wrong, unfair and unlawful, and for terminal benefits and compensatory damages totalling KES 219,296 with interest and costs. He averred that in September 2013 a director verbally terminated his services on grounds of downsizing, promising a recall that never came; that he never took annual leave; and that NSSF and NHIF dues were deducted but never remitted. The respondent did not enter appearance or file a defence, was deemed properly served on the affidavit of service sworn by a process server, and the cause proceeded as an undefended suit for formal proof on 19th December 2019, at which the claimant testified and adopted his documents. The court found the payslips and job identity card sufficient proof of an employment relationship. With the evidence uncontroverted, it held that the claimant was unfairly terminated under Section 45 of the Employment Act, 2007, being verbally terminated without notice or a hearing, and that the respondent proved no reasons for termination as required by Section 43. The court awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice (KES 14,240), payment in lieu of untaken leave for two years (KES 19,936) since the respondent produced no leave records, and compensation equivalent to six months' salary (KES 86,520) under Section 49. However, the claim for service gratuity and unremitted NSSF/NHIF dues failed for want of proof of non-remittance. Judgment was entered for KES 120,696 with costs and interest from the date of judgment, and the respondent was ordered to issue a Certificate of Service. Judgment was delivered virtually pursuant to COVID-19 directives.

Key legal issues

#
01

Fairness of termination

Holding

The verbal termination without notice or hearing was unfair and unlawful under Section 45 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

The claimant testified that his services were verbally terminated on grounds of reduced workload, without notice or a hearing. The respondent did not enter appearance or file a defence, so the evidence was uncontroverted. The court also found no proof by the respondent of the reasons for termination as required by Section 43 of the Employment Act.

p. 2
02

Payment in lieu of untaken leave

Holding

Awarded at KES 19,936 for the 2 years worked because the respondent produced no leave records

Reasoning

Sections 10 and 74 of the Employment Act require employers to keep records of employees' leave entitlement and days taken. Under Section 10(7), failure to produce such records shifts the burden to the employer. The respondent, having not defended the claim, produced no leave records, so the claimant's claim for untaken leave over 2 years was awarded.

p. 2
03

Compensation for unfair termination

Holding

Compensation equivalent to 6 months' salary (KES 86,520) awarded under Section 49 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

Having found unfair termination, the court considered the circumstances of the termination and the factors in Section 49 of the Employment Act, notably that the claimant had served for 2 years on a fairly meagre salary of KES 14,240 per month. It found the equivalent of 6 months' salary to be reasonable compensation in the circumstances.

p. 2
04

Service gratuity and unremitted statutory deductions

Holding

Claim failed for want of proof of non-remittance

Reasoning

The payslips showed NHIF and NSSF deductions, but the claimant produced no statements proving non-remittance to the relevant bodies, which it was incumbent on him to provide. The court noted that NSSF and NHIF have statutory mechanisms, including penalising employers, to give the claimant recourse if the sums were not remitted.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Verbal termination without notice or a hearing is unfair termination under Section 45 of the Employment Act, and the employer bears the burden of proving reasons for termination under Section 43
  • Where an employer fails to produce employment records such as leave records, the burden falls on the employer to prove or disprove the alleged term of employment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the claimant for the sum of KES 120,696/= (one month's notice pay KES 14,240; leave for 2 years KES 19,936; compensation equivalent of 6 months' salary KES 86,520)
  2. 2.Costs of the suit to the claimant
  3. 3.Interest on the decretal sum from the date of judgment until payment in full
  4. 4.Respondent to forthwith issue the claimant with his Certificate of Service

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 10, 10(7), 28, 43, 45, 49, 74
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 159(2)(d), 48
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act, 2007)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Fredrick Ouma Otieno v Falcon Signs Limited [2020] KEELRC 834 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 1049 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/834/eng@2020-06-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.