Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedMemorandum of Claim filed 25th July 2016 (ELRC)· [2020] KEELRC 741 (KLR)

Linda Ndenengo Mwakugu v Open Society Institute Company Limited [2020] KEELRC 741 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
3 July 2020
3,997 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded an employee three months' salary because her employer failed to give timely notice before her fixed-term contract expired.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant sued her former employer alleging that its failure to issue a compliant 3-month notice of non-renewal of her fixed-term contract, as required by Clause 8.5.1 of the HR Handbook, breached sections 41 and 45 of the Employment Act and constructively renewed her contract for three years. She sought declarations to that effect, 36 months' salary for loss of expectation, and 12 months' compensation for unfair dismissal. The respondent maintained that the fixed-term contract lapsed by effluxion of time, that it was entitled to pay 3 months' salary in lieu of notice, and that there was no legitimate expectation of renewal. The court framed three issues: legitimate expectation, unfairness of termination, and entitlement to reliefs. It found legitimate expectation of renewal arising from the failure to serve timely notice of non-renewal, the employer's approval in May 2016 of training scheduled for July 2016 (beyond the contract term), and the Managing Director's assurance days before expiry that there would be no job losses. However, following the Court of Appeal's decision in Registered Trustees of the PCEA v Ruth Gathoni Ngotho-Kariuki, the court held that failure to give the contractual notice did not amount to automatic renewal, and since the respondent did communicate its intention not to renew, albeit late, there was no unfair termination. The court awarded the claimant 3 months' salary (Kshs.954,000) as compensation for the breach of her legitimate expectation, with costs of the suit and interest from the date of judgment. The claims for constructive renewal, 36 months' salary and 12 months' compensation were refused.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether legitimate expectation of renewal arose from the employer's failure to issue 3 months' notice of non-renewal

Holding

Yes - legitimate expectation arose from the late notice, approval of training beyond the contract term, and assurances of no job losses

Reasoning

The HR Handbook clause required 3 months' notice of non-renewal. The respondent gave only 3 days' notice. It approved training in July 2016 outside the contract term and its Managing Director assured staff days before expiry that there would be no job losses. These conduct elements, falling within the would-be notice period, grounded a legitimate expectation of renewal, though the Court of Appeal authority precludes automatic renewal.

p. 5
02

Whether the failure to give timely notice of non-renewal amounted to constructive renewal or unfair termination

Holding

No - the contract was not constructively renewed and there was no unfair termination

Reasoning

Following the Court of Appeal in Ruth Gathoni Ngotho-Kariuki, failure to give the contractual 3 months' notice does not amount to automatic renewal since renewal requires mutual consent. The respondent did communicate its intention not to renew, albeit late, so the contract lapsed by effluxion of time. What was breached was the legitimate expectation, compensable by 3 months' salary.

p. 5
03

What remedies flow from the breach of legitimate expectation

Holding

3 months' salary (Kshs.954,000), not 36 months nor 12 months' compensation

Reasoning

Having found no unfair termination and no constructive renewal, the statutory 12-month maximum compensation under section 49(1) was unavailable. The court exercised discretion to award 3 months' salary as adequate compensation for the breach of legitimate expectation, with costs and interest from judgment.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A fixed-term contract is not automatically renewed by an employer's failure to give notice of non-renewal; the breach is of the employee's legitimate expectation of renewal, not of the contract
  • The burden of proof in legitimate expectation claims lies on the employee, and the representation must be clear and unambiguous

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award of 3 months' salary to the claimant in the sum of Kshs.954,000 as compensation for breach of legitimate expectation of renewal
  2. 2.Respondent to pay the claimant's costs of the suit
  3. 3.Interest to accrue from the date of judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsections 41, 45
  • Employment ActSection 49(1)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d); Article 48
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)Section 1B
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (12)

  • Jayne K. Mwanza v National Water Conservation & Pipeline Corporation
    [2014] eKLR
  • Caroline Muthoni Njoroge v LVCT Health
    [2019] eKLR
  • Margaret A. Ochieng v National Water Conservation & Pipeline Corporation
    [2014] eKLR
  • Ruth Gathoni Ngotho v PCEA and Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Cleopatra Kama Mugyenyi v Aidspan
    [2019] eKLR
  • Teresa Carlo Omondi v Transparency International-Kenya
    [2017] eKLR
  • Trocaire v Catherine Wambui Karuno
    [2018] eKLR
  • Kenya Airways Limited v Alex Wainaina Mbugua
    [2019] eKLR
  • Roberts M. Ndegwa v The Minister for Tourism
    [2012] eKLR
  • Registered Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of East Africa & Another v Ruth Gathoni Ngotho-Kariuki
    [2017] eKLR
  • Minnie Mbue vs. Jamii Bora Bank Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenneth Karisa Kasemo vs. Kenya Bureau of Standards
    [2013] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance employment and labour relations dispute under the Employment Act, heard by the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Linda Ndenengo Mwakugu v Open Society Institute Company Limited [2020] KEELRC 741 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Memorandum of Claim filed 25th July 2016 (ELRC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/741/eng@2020-07-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.