Edward Munene Kanyi v Kenyatta University [2020] KEELRC 738 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court ruled Kenyatta University wrongly treated a long-serving worker as casual, awarding him Kshs. 650,520 for unfair termination without notice or hearing.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Claimant's casual employment was converted into a term contract under section 37 of the Employment Act
Yes - continuous service from 2011 to 2015 with monthly salary payments and NSSF remittances converted the casual engagement into permanent and pensionable employment
The court noted NSSF remittances made continuously from 2011 to 2014 and erratically to March 2015 by Kenyatta University, and monthly bank payments from 2013 to 2014. Although the Respondent treated the Claimant as a casual worker on shift rotas, the length of continuous service and the manner of payment brought the contract within section 37 of the Employment Act, deeming it one with monthly wages.
Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was fair and justified
No - the termination was oral, without notice and without a hearing, and therefore unfair and unjustified under section 45(2) of the Employment Act
Having found the Claimant's employment had converted, the court held he should have been terminated after due notice and with valid reasons. No hearing was given before the HR Manager directed termination for gross misconduct following the internal audit, breaching section 41 and rendering the dismissal unfair under section 45(2).
What remedies were payable
Notice pay, 10 months' compensation for unfair termination, service pay for 4 years and house allowance limited to 3 years, totalling Kshs. 650,520
The court awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice, ten months' salary as compensation for unlawful and unfair termination, service pay calculated at 15 days' salary per year worked (2011–2015) and house allowance for 26 months, holding the balance of the house allowance claim time barred.
Legal principles established
#- A casual employee who has worked continuously for an extended period with monthly salary payments and NSSF contributions has a contract deemed converted to monthly terms under section 37 of the Employment Act
- Termination effected orally, without notice and without a hearing is unfair and unjustified under section 45(2) of the Employment Act
Court orders
#- 1.One month's salary in lieu of notice of Kshs. 25,020
- 2.Ten months' salary as compensation for unlawful and unfair termination (Kshs. 250,200)
- 3.Service pay equivalent to 15 days' salary for each of 4 years worked (2011–2015) of Kshs. 50,040
- 4.House allowance for 3 years (the rest of the claim being time barred) of Kshs. 325,260
- 5.Total award of Kshs. 650,520
- 6.Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (unfair termination claim)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Edward Munene Kanyi v Kenyatta University [2020] KEELRC 738 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Employment Cause (Nairobi), Memorandum of Claim dated 23/09/2015 (Amended 07/01/2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/738/eng@2020-07-09
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.