Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 25th February 2020 (ELRC cause, Machakos)· [2020] KEELRC 656 (KLR)

Francis Ochieng Abila & 24 others v Career Directions Limited [2020] KEELRC 656 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 April 2020
1,105 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court refused a law firm's attempt to block payment to workers, ruling the real fight was a partnership breakup it had no power to hear.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Machakos (Linnet Ndolo, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 25th February 2020 by the law firm of Angeline Adhiambo & Associates, Acting Advocate for the Claimants in an employment cause. The firm sought security for costs of Kshs. 117,160 (Advocate/Client costs) pending taxation of its Bill of Costs, a temporary stay of proceedings due to issues of representation, and a stay of payment of compensation for unlawful termination and terminal dues until the Bill of Costs was taxed. The trigger was a Notice of Change of Advocates filed on 28th January 2020 by Onyango Onunga & Co Advocates. The 1st Claimant, Francis Ochieng Abila, deponed that he had originally instructed Omollo Onyango and Company Advocates, a partnership between Miss Angeline Omollo and Miss Jane Akinyi Onyango which was dissolved on 14th September 2019, and that he instructed Miss Onyango, under her new firm, to conclude the matter. The court held that the real dispute was the terms of dissolution of the partnership between the two Advocates, a matter beyond the specialised jurisdiction of the ELRC, and that any advocate/client fees dispute is cured by taxation of an Advocate/Client Bill of Costs before a Taxing Master. The Bill of Costs also assumed full professional services had been rendered, which the record did not confirm. The application was dismissed with costs to the Claimant. The ruling was delivered electronically pursuant to COVID-19 directions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction to determine the dispute underlying the application

Holding

It does not; the real dispute is the dissolution of a partnership between two Advocates, which lies outside the court's specialised jurisdiction

Reasoning

The court scrutinised the pleadings and submissions and identified that the application was anchored on the fallout between Miss Angeline Omollo and Miss Jane Akinyi Onyango over distribution of files following dissolution of their partnership. Such a dispute is not an employment and labour relations matter and is therefore beyond the specialised jurisdiction of the ELRC. Advocate/client fees disputes, on the other hand, are addressed through taxation before a Taxing Master.

p. 2
02

Whether security for costs of Kshs. 117,160 should be ordered

Holding

No; the Bill of Costs underpinning the figure assumes full professional services were rendered to conclusion, which the record does not confirm

Reasoning

The court examined the Bill of Costs attached to the application and found it assumed that Miss Angeline Omollo had rendered full professional services up to conclusion of the matter. The court record did not support that proposition, so the foundation for the security for costs claim failed. The application was accordingly found to be without merit and dismissed with costs to the Claimant.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Disputes arising from the dissolution of a partnership between Advocates fall outside the specialised jurisdiction of the ELRC
  • Advocate/client fees disputes are remedied by taxation of an Advocate/Client Bill of Costs before a Taxing Master

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 25th February 2020 is dismissed with costs to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 40
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 18
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (3)

  • Joseph Sifa Kaingu v Jihan Freighters
    Mombasa ELRC Cause No 214 of 2015
  • Gibson Momanyi v Mombasa Apparel (EPZ)
    Kilifi Employment Cause No 1 of 2019
  • Martin Maghanga v Umoja Rubber Limited
    Kilifi CMCC No 41 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (specialised jurisdiction of the ELRC); Article 159(2)(d) and Article 40 of the Constitution of Kenya invoked in the delivery order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Francis Ochieng Abila & 24 others v Career Directions Limited [2020] KEELRC 656 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Notice of Motion dated 25th February 2020 (ELRC cause, Machakos). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/656/eng@2020-04-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.