Henry Owino Obonyo & another v Kenya Airways Limited [2020] KEELRC 593 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether new and important evidence warranted review
No; the evidence relied on was already before the Court during the hearing and formed part of the basis of the judgment
The Applicant alleged it discovered new evidence that the 2nd Claimant had been employed by the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority and Jubba Airways after termination. However, the 2nd Claimant had testified at trial that he had attempted to obtain alternative employment with two organisations and was terminated once his prior termination by the Applicant was discovered. The judgment was therefore made with full knowledge of this information, and nothing new had been placed before the Court to warrant review.
Threshold for review under the ELRC (Procedure) Rules 2016
Discovery of new and important evidence is a good ground for review, but the Applicant failed to establish the required nexus between the evidence and the judgment
The court acknowledged that discovery of new and important matter is a recognised ground for review under the ELRC (Procedure) Rules 2016. The burden, however, rests on the Applicant to show that the judgment was reached only because the evidence was unavailable at trial. Since the information about the 2nd Claimant's subsequent short-term engagements was adduced at trial, that burden was not discharged and the application failed.
Legal principles established
#- A party seeking review must establish that it was only on the basis of non-availability of the new evidence that the court reached the judgment it did
- Evidence already adduced at trial cannot constitute new and important matter for review
Court orders
#- 1.The application for review is dismissed
- 2.Costs to the Respondents in this application
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Review jurisdiction under the Employment & Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Henry Owino Obonyo & another v Kenya Airways Limited [2020] KEELRC 593 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No 1515 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/593/eng@2020-07-30
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.