Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No. 19 of 2020 (Ruling No. 2)· [2020] KEELRC 540 (KLR)

Kenya Long Distance Truck Drivers and Allied Workers Union v Masters Fabricators Limited (Cause 19 of 2020) (Employment and Labour) [2020] KEELRC 540 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
6 August 2020
1,352 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court refused to punish an employer for contempt because it proved it paid union dues, and left the unpaid leave dispute for full trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Radido Stephen, Judge) determined a motion dated 22 May 2020 filed by the Kenya Long Distance Truck Drivers and Allied Workers Union against Masters Fabricators Limited. The Union sought warrants of arrest against the Respondent's directors for alleged breach of the Court's orders of 8 May 2020 (requiring compliance with sections 48 and 50 of the Labour Relations Act on deduction and remittance of union subscriptions), orders prohibiting the Respondent from replacing union members except through due process, an order compelling the recall of employees sent on compulsory unpaid leave, and an order compelling engagement with the Union. On the contempt limb, the Respondent produced cheques and bank deposit slips showing that union dues for employees on the May 2020 payroll were deducted and deposited on 5 June 2020; the Court found no breach warranting warrants of arrest. On the compulsory unpaid leave of some 18 employees, the Respondent demonstrated consultations (memos, minutes, notice and a letter to the County Labour Office) and reliance on COVID-19 public health directives on social distancing and bans on gatherings; whether the unpaid leave was lawful and contractually supported was reserved for a hearing on the merits. Allegations of replacement by casual labourers and intimidation of union members were unsupported by evidence. The Court made observations on the need for good-faith dialogue between employers and unions, dismissed the motion dated 22 May 2020, and awarded costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Alleged breach of court orders justifying contempt warrants

Holding

No breach was established; the contempt application was without merit

Reasoning

The Union asserted the Respondent ignored the order requiring deduction and remittance of union dues. The Respondent produced cheques and bank deposit slips showing deductions for employees on the May 2020 payroll were made and deposited on 5 June 2020. On this documentary evidence the Court found no breach warranting warrants of arrest or the directors being called to show cause.

p. 2
02

Compulsory unpaid leave at the interlocutory stage

Holding

The Respondent demonstrated some form of consultations and compliance with COVID-19 health protocols; the legality of the unpaid leave must await a hearing on the merits

Reasoning

Section 10(5) of the Employment Act requires consultation before changing employment particulars such as remuneration. The Respondent produced a memo, minutes, notice and letter to the County Labour Office evidencing consultation, and invoked COVID-19 social distancing directives. Whether the leave was lawful and contractually supported was reserved for trial; at the interlocutory stage the Court could not fault the Respondent.

p. 2
03

Alleged victimisation, discrimination and replacement by casual labourers

Holding

The allegations were unsupported by evidence

Reasoning

The Union asserted employees sent on leave were replaced by casuals and that members were threatened with untoward action if they refused to resign from the Union. The Court noted no evidence was laid to prove these assertions, which would have lent credence to claims of victimisation, dishonesty, attempt to defeat justice and discrimination.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 10(5) of the Employment Act, 2007 requires consultations before the change of certain employment particulars, including remuneration during the tenure of the contract
  • Employers should engage unions in good faith; such engagement advances the interests of employer, workers and social justice

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The motion dated 22 May 2020 was dismissed
  2. 2.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Actsections 48 and 50
  • Employment Act, 2007section 10(5)
  • Constitution of Kenyarecognition of the role of Unions
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction; enforcement of the Court's orders of 8 May 2020 under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Long Distance Truck Drivers and Allied Workers Union v Masters Fabricators Limited (Cause 19 of 2020)  (Employment and Labour) [2020] KEELRC 540 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 19 of 2020 (Ruling No. 2). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/540/eng@2020-08-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.