Esther Nyaruai Kabau Wanyoike v George Sichangi & another [2020] KEELRC 474 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court reinstated a dismissed lawsuit because there was no proof the claimant was ever served with a hearing notice.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the suit dismissed for non-attendance on 2nd April 2019 should be set aside and reinstated
The application succeeds; the dismissal order is set aside and the suit reinstated because there is no evidence of service of the hearing notice
The court noted that the claim was dismissed under Rule 22(2) of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules for failure to attend court. That rule presupposes service of a hearing notice with an affidavit of service on record. The hearing notice on record bore no stamps proving service and there was no affidavit of service, so the Applicant was not shown to have been served with notice of the 2nd April 2019 hearing, justifying setting aside the dismissal.
Legal principles established
#- A suit cannot be dismissed for non-attendance unless there is evidence that the hearing notice was served on the parties, supported by an affidavit of service
Court orders
#- 1.The orders of 2nd April 2019 dismissing the suit are set aside
- 2.The suit is reinstated
- 3.Costs of the application shall be in the cause
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, Rule 22
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Esther Nyaruai Kabau Wanyoike v George Sichangi & another [2020] KEELRC 474 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/474/eng@2020-09-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.