Bernard Ndungu Mbugua v Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company Limited [2020] KEELRC 462 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court dismissed a former employee's applications seeking confirmation of an award that had already been computed and paid to his previous advocates.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the court should confirm and endorse the computation of the award
The application was dismissed because the award had already been computed and paid to the claimant's former advocates by cheque dated 9th October 2019, so the applications were overtaken by events.
The respondent's Legal Officer, Patrick Maina, swore a replying affidavit showing the award was computed (unutilized leave, three months' pay in lieu of notice less PAYE) and paid by cheque to S. Ndungu and Company Advocates, the claimant's then counsel, with all correspondence attached. The court therefore found the claimant's current counsel came on record after the decretal sum was settled, leaving nothing to confirm.
Legal principles established
#Court orders
#- 1.Dismissal of the claimant's applications dated 9th March, 6th April and 20th April 2020
- 2.No orders as to costs ('the applications are dismissed with no orders for costs')
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Original employment jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court; application for confirmation/endorsement of computation of an award in a matter decided by the same court on 12th July 2019
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Bernard Ndungu Mbugua v Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company Limited [2020] KEELRC 462 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/462/eng@2020-09-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.