Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedEmployment Cause (number not stated in judgment; filed 21.5.2018)· [2020] KEELRC 413 (KLR)

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Tourism Promotion Services (Management) Limited t/a Serena Lodges and Hotels; Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hotel Hospital Workers & another (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELRC 413 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 October 2020
4,296 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a hotel union's recognition suit because the same issues had already been decided in earlier cases between the same parties.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
KHAWU, a trade union for hotel industry employees, sued claiming it had recruited 853 of 1100 unionisable employees of the respondent hotel but the respondent refused to sign a recognition agreement, and that the respondent continued deducting union dues and agency fees in favour of the rival union KUDHEIHA from members who had resigned from it. KHAWU sought declarations of unfair labour practice and unconstitutional deductions, an order compelling recognition, stoppage of further deductions, and refunds. The respondent and the two interested parties (KUDHEIHA and the employers' association) opposed the suit as res judicata and unmerited, arguing the respondent was bound by a recognition agreement and CBA between the association and KUDHEIHA, and that the majority threshold under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act must be measured across the association's members. After disposing of the matter by written submissions, the court framed five issues and held that the recognition and agency fee issues had already been fully determined in earlier suits between the same parties, including ELRC Petition No.5 of 2013 and KHAWU v Hilton Hotel Nairobi, as well as conflicting decisions of the court such as KHAWU v Great Rift Valley Lodge & Golf Resort, where a stay was granted by the Court of Appeal. The court found the suit res judicata, declined to determine recognition and refund afresh, declined to adopt the Conciliator's report, and dismissed the suit with no order as to costs, advising the parties to pursue the pending appeal to settle the dispute conclusively.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata

Holding

The suit is res judicata; the recognition and agency fee issues were fully determined in ELRC Petition No.5 of 2013, Cause 1194 of 2014 and other suits between the same parties

Reasoning

The respondent and interested parties showed that the same issues - whether individual members of the employers' association can be compelled to accord recognition when the association has a recognition agreement and CBA with KUDHEIHA, and whether agency fees levied on members who withdrew from KUDHEIHA are lawful - had been determined by courts of concurrent jurisdiction in prior litigation between the same parties. Continuing to litigate the same issues amid conflicting decisions would never end the dispute, so the court found the matter res judicata and declined to determine the merits afresh.

p. 5
02

Conciliator's report

Holding

The court declined to adopt the Conciliation report dated 30.9.2019 because the suit is res judicata

Reasoning

Having found the entire suit res judicata, the court declined to determine recognition and refund of agency fees afresh and, for the same reason, declined to adopt the Conciliator's report. The 2nd Interested Party had also argued the Conciliator exceeded her mandate by dealing with recognition when the reference was only on agency fees.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Litigation over the same issues between the same parties must come to an end; repeating suits over matters already determined by courts of concurrent jurisdiction is res judicata
  • Conflicting first-instance decisions on the same issue between the same players can only be settled by the Court of Appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit is dismissed
  2. 2.No order as to costs
  3. 3.Refusal to adopt the Conciliation report dated 30.9.2019

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 19
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 4
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 5
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 6
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 48
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 49
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 54
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 23
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 36
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 40
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41(5)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010section 22 of the Sixth Schedule
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (11)

  • KHAWU v Kericho Tea Hotel
    Cause 36 of 2005
  • KHAWU v Grand Regency Hotel
    Cause 39 of 2007
  • National Union of Water and Sewerage Employees & Others v Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company Limited & Others
    Civil Appeal 18 of 2013
  • Nofolk Hotel v Industrial Court
    Petition 405 of 2009 [2012] eKLR
  • KHAWU v The Sun Hotel
    Cause 376 of 2015
  • KHAWU v Great Rift Valley Lodge & Golf Resort
    [2014] eKLR
  • Rift Valley Railways Workers Union v Rift Valley Railways (Kenya) Limited & another
    [2014] eKLR
  • KHAWU v Hilton Hotel Nairobi
    Cause 1194 of 2014
  • Tailors and Textile Workers Union v Ashton Apparel (EPZ) Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • KHAWU v Pangoni Beach Resort
    Cause No.380 of 2013 [2015] eKLR
  • KHAWU v Great Rift Valley Golf Resort/Green Park and Country Complex
    Cause 377 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 5 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007 read together with Article 23 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Tourism Promotion Services (Management) Limited t/a Serena Lodges and Hotels; Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hotel Hospital Workers & another (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELRC 413 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Employment Cause (number not stated in judgment; filed 21.5.2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/413/eng@2020-10-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.