Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition (filed 22 July 2020) - number not stated in judgment· [2020] KEELRC 298 (KLR)

Abdi Dubow Koriow v Hassan Nassip Jelle & 3 others [2020] KEELRC 298 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 October 2020
1,804 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed you cannot resign from a public job, run for office, then reclaim the job unilaterally when your political bid changes.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, appointed Assistant Chief for Sangole sub-location in 1993, resigned around 3 January 2017 to contest a Member of County Assembly seat. On 6 March 2017 he purported to revoke his resignation, resumed work, and received remuneration for a few months, but was issued a Certificate of Nomination by IEBC on 30 May 2017. In January 2018 he sought reinstatement; he was told to reapply, and his two appeals were declined by the Public Service Commission and the Cabinet Secretary. The Assistant Chief position was later advertised; he also failed to secure the vacant Chief position for Sangole Location. He petitioned the Court in July 2020 alleging unfair, discriminatory appointment of the new Chief and Assistant Chief, violation of his legitimate expectation, and breach of contract, claiming salary from December 2017 to November 2019. The Court, applying the Supreme Court's formulation of legitimate expectation and English authorities on withdrawal of resignation, held that a resignation once given cannot be unilaterally withdrawn, that continued payment of remuneration was an error, and that no clear representation created a legitimate expectation. The Petitioner adduced no evidence of clan discrimination, predetermination or lack of merit in the 1st Respondent's appointment, nor of any breach of Article 232 values. The claim of unfair dismissal failed on the record. The Petition was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether payment of remuneration after purported revocation of resignation created a legitimate expectation of continued employment

Holding

No legitimate expectation arose; there was no clear and unambiguous representation accepting the revocation, and the payments were erroneous

Reasoning

The Petitioner voluntarily resigned and unilaterally attempted to cancel the resignation and resume work without the employer's go-ahead. He obtained a nomination certificate from IEBC. No evidence of any clear representation accepting the revocation; the Respondents explained continued payment as an error consistent with bureaucratic delay, and the Petitioner did not rebut this or show duties performed with the employer's concurrence.

p. 3
02

Whether the 1st Respondent's appointment met constitutional values and principles of public service under Article 232

Holding

The Petitioner failed to prove the allegations; no evidence of clan bias, predetermination or lack of merit

Reasoning

Article 232 sets values of accountability, transparency, merit, competition, equal opportunities and representation. The Petitioner merely asserted clan affinity and predetermination without presenting corroborative evidence, nor any evidence of the advertised qualifications or the 1st Respondent's qualifications and experience.

p. 4
03

Breach of contract claim for unpaid remuneration December 2017 to November 2019

Holding

No breach of contract; the Petitioner resigned and his reinstatement appeals were declined

Reasoning

The Petitioner unilaterally resigned, attempted to revoke the resignation, and his appeals to the Public Service Commission and Cabinet Secretary failed. Remuneration paid after the purported revocation was without consideration and paid in error; the employer, not the Petitioner, would be entitled to restitution on unjust enrichment.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A resignation once given cannot be unilaterally withdrawn without the employer's concurrence
  • For an expectation to be legitimate it must be founded upon a promise or practice by the public authority expected to fulfil it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Petition is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 232

Cases cited (5)

  • Communications Commission of Kenya & 5 Others v Royal Media Services & 5 Ors
    (2014) eKLR
  • Jane Kiongo & 15 Ors v Laikipia University & 6 Ors
    (2019) eKLR
  • Riordan v War Office
    (1961) 1 WLR 210
  • Harris & Russel Ltd v Slingsby
    (1973) IRLR 221
  • Brennan v C Lindley and Co Ltd
    (1974) IRLR 153
Jurisdiction invoked
Original constitutional petition jurisdiction (petition alleging violation of constitutional rights and breach of contract); specific provision not stated in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Abdi Dubow Koriow v Hassan Nassip Jelle & 3 others [2020] KEELRC 298 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Petition (filed 22 July 2020) - number not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/298/eng@2020-10-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.