Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition (with Notice of Motion dated 24/4/2020) - Employment and Labour Relations Court, Nairobi· [2020] KEELRC 271 (KLR)

Kenya County Government Workers Union v The Attorney General & 4 others [2020] KEELRC 271 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 October 2020
3,504 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court protected 112 Nairobi county workers from termination over a missed secondment exercise, but let the broader staff transfer to Nairobi Metropolitan Services stand.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi delivered by Hellen Wasilwa, J on 29 October 2020. The Applicant union, which has a recognition agreement and a CBA with the Nairobi City County Government, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 24/4/2020 seeking interim restraining orders protecting its members from termination, harassment, intimidation or apprehension arising from the secondment exercise conducted by the Public Service Commission on 6th and 7th April 2020, as well as judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the secondment of county staff to the Nairobi Metropolitan Services. The Applicant argued that the secondment instrument was executed by the wrong body, lacked public participation, and imposed irrational documentation requirements putting members at risk of arbitrary termination. The 3rd Respondent countered that the exercise had been overtaken by events - 6,731 of 6,843 staff had been deployed, only 112 had not collected their letters and remained free to do so - that public participation was conducted in all 17 sub-counties, and that the Court lacked jurisdiction over the Deed of Transfer. The court framed a single issue: whether to restrain the termination of members who failed to attend the secondment exercise. Finding the application substantially overtaken by events, the court confined interim protection to the 112 outstanding employees, directing that they should not be terminated pending determination of the Petition, and reserved costs to the Petition.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Court should restrain termination of employees who failed to attend or complete the secondment documentation exercise

Holding

Yes, but only in respect of the 112 employees who had not yet collected their secondment letters; the bulk of the exercise had been completed and the interim protection was confined to them pending the Petition

Reasoning

The 3rd Respondent demonstrated that the secondment and deployment exercise was substantially complete, with 6,731 of 6,843 staff having reported and been deployed. In light of that fact, the court found the only live concern was the 112 employees who had yet to collect their letters, and protected them from arbitrary termination pending the hearing of the Petition.

02

Whether the application had been overtaken by events

Holding

Substantially yes - the secondment and deployment exercise had been completed on 9/4/2020, with the 112 outstanding employees free to collect their letters at any time

Reasoning

The 3rd Respondent's Replying Affidavit showed that 6,731 of 6,843 staff collected secondment letters and reported to work, and that the remaining 112 were at liberty to collect theirs at the NMS offices at KICC. This rendered the blanket prayers moot and shaped the narrow relief granted.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Employees who did not attend or complete a secondment documentation exercise should not be terminated, harassed or intimidated pending determination of the substantive petition challenging the secondment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 112 employees who did not collect their secondment letters should not be terminated, harassed, intimidated or apprehended pending the hearing and determination of the Petition
  2. 2.Costs reserved to the Petition

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 23(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 187
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 234(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 235
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 10 and 232
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Actsection 12(3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016Rule 28
  • County Government Actsections 57 and 59
  • Intergovernmental Relations Actsection 29
  • Public Service Commission Guidelines on Secondment of Public Officers, 2016definition of secondment
  • Deed of Transfer (Gazette Notice No. 1609 of 25th February, 2020)Articles 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7

Cases cited (14)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    [1973] EA 358
  • Mrao Ltd v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 Others
    [2003] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • David Barasa v British Peace Support Team & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Rev. John Mungania v Kenya Methodist University & Prof. Mutuma Mugambi
  • Chang'orok Komolng'ole Erick v County Government of West Pokot & 3 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenya National Union of Nurses v Nairobi County Government & 5 Others
  • Captain Geoffrey Kujoga v Attorney General Misc. Application No. 293 of 1993
  • Republic v Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Geoffrey Githinji and 9 Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
  • Joaninah Wanjiku Maina v County Government of Nairobi & 2 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v Republic
    (1979) KLR 154
  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mercy Nduta Mwangi t/a Mwangi Kangara & Co. Advocates v Invesco Assurance Company Limited
    [2019] eKLR
  • Law Society of Kenya v Attorney General & 2 Others
    [2013] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 23(3) of the Constitution, section 12(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and Rule 28 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016 (as invoked by the Applicant)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya County Government Workers Union v The Attorney General & 4 others [2020] KEELRC 271 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Petition (with Notice of Motion dated 24/4/2020) - Employment and Labour Relations Court, Nairobi. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/271/eng@2020-10-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.