Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 550 of 2019· [2020] KEELRC 189 (KLR)

Peter Muigai Wairigu & 8 others v Catholic University of Eastern Africa [2020] KEELRC 189 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 November 2020
1,639 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Kenya Private Universities Workers Union, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 16th June 2020 seeking a declaration that Cause No. 550 of 2019 was sub judice to Cause No. 805 of 2017, striking out of the Statement of Claim filed on 22nd August 2019, and costs. It was supported by the affidavit of Erick Omondi Njiri, the Human Resource Manager, who deposed that Cause 805 of 2017, filed earlier after the terminations on grounds of redundancy, was pending between the same parties over the same subject matter. The Respondents, through Peter Muigai Wairigu, countered that the two suits were distinct: Cause 805 of 2017 concerned the Union's right of access to its members and remittance of dues, while the instant claim concerned unlawful retrenchment and non-payment of dues. The Applicant relied on Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and authorities setting out the elements of sub judice, showing that all Claimants in Cause 550 of 2019 except two were grievants in Cause 805 of 2017. The Respondents relied on authority that a preliminary point of law must dispose of the matter without ascertaining facts. The Court found the redundancy issues common to both suits, making the later claim sub judice, but noted divergence on union access and dues. Rather than striking out the claim, the Court gave the parties 30 days to amend or consolidate the two causes and directed mention before the Principal Judge, with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Sub judice under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Cause 550 of 2019 is sub judice to Cause 805 of 2017 because the parties overlap almost entirely and the redundancy issues are substantially the same

Reasoning

Cause 805 of 2017 was filed earlier by the Union on behalf of members including all the Claimants in Cause 550 of 2019 except two. Both matters concern redundancies and compensation arising from the same terminations. Only the union access and dues issues in Cause 805 of 2017 differ. The overlap on the redundancy question made the later suit sub judice, warranting amendment or consolidation rather than outright striking out.

p. 3
02

Whether the striking out remedy was appropriate

Holding

The court declined to strike out the claim, preferring amendment to exclude duplicated claimants or consolidation of the two causes

Reasoning

Although the sub judice principle was engaged, the divergence on union access and dues issues meant total striking out was not the cure. The court instead granted 30 days for the parties, counsel and the union to consider amendment or consolidation, with mention before the Principal Judge for directions.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where two suits between the same parties raise substantially the same issues, the later suit is sub judice and the court may direct amendment or consolidation rather than striking out

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that Cause No. 550 of 2019 is sub judice to Cause No. 805 of 2017
  2. 2.Parties given 30 days to consider the necessary amendments or consolidation of the two causes
  3. 3.Matter to be mentioned before the Principal Judge for further directions
  4. 4.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6

Cases cited (3)

  • Republic v Registrars of Societies- Kenya & 2 Others ex parte Moses Kirima and 2 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd v Elizabeth Agidza & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Kandara Residence Association & Ano v Ananas Holdings Limited & 4 Others, Director of Survey & 3 Others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act (sub judice rule)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peter Muigai Wairigu & 8 others v Catholic University of Eastern Africa [2020] KEELRC 189 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Cause No. 550 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/189/eng@2020-11-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.