Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedKisumu Petition No. 27 of 2020 (consolidated with Kisumu Petition No. 32 of 2020; JR proceedings arising from ELRC Eldoret leave granted 8 September 2020)· [2020] KEELRC 130 (KLR)

Republic v Speaker, County Assembly of Homa Bay & 2 others Ex Parte Ramos Fidel & another; Daniel Odhiambo Kaudo (Interested Party) [2020] KEELRC 130 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 December 2020
837 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a judicial review case because the applicants missed deadlines, skipped required documents, and appeared to be forum shopping.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Ramos Fidel and Owuocha Omondi obtained leave on 8 September 2020 in the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret to institute judicial review proceedings concerning the suspension from office of Daniel Odhiambo Kaudo, the Interested Party, with leave operating as a stay until 29 September 2020. The court directed that a substantive Motion be filed within 10 days and transferred proceedings to Kisumu, where the file was consolidated with Kisumu Petition No. 27 of 2020 and Kisumu Petition No. 32 of 2020. The applicants filed the substantive Motion on 6 October 2020, outside the 10-day window, without seeking leave to file or have it admitted out of time, and without annexing the Statutory Statement and affidavits filed at the leave stage as required by Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Radido J additionally found that the Clerk of the County Assembly, on whose behalf the proceedings purportedly were brought, had himself commenced action on 27 July 2020 to vindicate his rights, and that the applicants had conveniently moved the Court in Eldoret rather than Kisumu within whose jurisdictional limit the matter fell. Relying on Halsbury's Laws of England on the discretionary nature of quashing, prohibiting and mandatory orders, the court held that the applicants' conduct, delay and the futility of relief disentitled them to any remedy. The judicial review proceedings were found incompetent and an abuse of court process, and the Notice of Motion dated 27 September 2020 was dismissed with costs to the Respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competency of the substantive Motion filed out of time without leave

Holding

The Motion was incompetent as it was filed outside the 10-day window and without leave, and was not accompanied by the Statutory Statement and affidavits filed at leave stage

Reasoning

The leave order directed that a substantive Motion be filed within 10 days. The applicants filed on 6 October 2020 without seeking extension or admission out of time. Further, Order 53 requires the Motion to be accompanied by the Statutory Statement and affidavits, which were absent. These omissions rendered the proceedings incompetent.

p. 2
02

Abuse of court process and discretionary refusal of judicial review relief

Holding

The proceedings were an abuse of process; relief was refused in the court's discretion because the Clerk had already commenced earlier action and the applicants conveniently moved the Court in Eldoret outside the Kisumu jurisdictional limit

Reasoning

The Clerk of the County Assembly, on whose behalf the proceedings purportedly were instituted, had commenced action on 27 July 2020 to vindicate his own rights. The applicants must have been aware yet moved the Court in Eldoret rather than Kisumu. Applying Halsbury's Laws, discretionary remedies may be declined for undue delay, unmeritorious conduct or futility.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Judicial review remedies are discretionary and may be declined on grounds of the applicant's conduct, delay, acquiescence, waiver or futility notwithstanding merits

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 27 September 2020 and filed on 6 October 2020 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the Motion to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction under Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules as exercised by the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Speaker, County Assembly of Homa Bay & 2 others Ex Parte Ramos Fidel & another; Daniel Odhiambo Kaudo (Interested Party) [2020] KEELRC 130 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Kisumu Petition No. 27 of 2020 (consolidated with Kisumu Petition No. 32 of 2020; JR proceedings arising from ELRC Eldoret leave granted 8 September 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/130/eng@2020-12-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.