Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNakuru ELRC Cause No. 68 of 2019 (dealt with within consolidated Nyeri ELRC Cause No. 31 of 2019)· [2020] KEELRC 63 (KLR)

James Mungai Muhia v Kenya National Union of Teachers & 2 others [2020] KEELRC 63 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 October 2020
9,381 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~38 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled KNUT's suspension of its Nakuru Branch Secretary was unfair, but he still had to retire at 60, winning only unpaid dues plus interest.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, Executive Secretary of KNUT Nakuru Branch elected in February 2016, challenged his suspension by letter dated 19th August 2019 on grounds of dishonesty, failure to obey BEC decisions and abuse of office, following allegations that he paid himself Kshs. 480,000 from the Union's Education Fund using irregular ATP vouchers. He sought declarations that the suspension was illegal, quashing orders, and a permanent injunction against investigation. The Respondents countered that he had attained the mandatory retirement age of sixty in January 2019 and that the suspension followed a properly convened BEC meeting of 12th August 2019. The court framed four issues: lawfulness of the suspension, fair procedure, remedies, and costs. It held that the disciplinary meeting did not amount to a fair trial: the Claimant received only three days' notice to attend on a gazetted public holiday, was denied adequate time to prepare a defence, and the allegations remained mere allegations of impropriety. However, adopting Nduma J.'s holding in Joshua O. Ogalo, the court found the Claimant's service had ended by effluxion of time upon attaining sixty years under the KNUT constitution, so he could not be reinstated. On quantum, the Respondents' letter of 20th November 2019 admitted an outstanding balance of Kshs. 378,805.80, which the court awarded with interest at 14% per annum from judgment until payment in full. Contempt findings were left pending before the Court of Appeal. The claim was partially allowed; judgment was entered for the Claimant for Kshs. 378,805.80 plus interest and costs on the lower scale.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suspension of the Claimant was warranted and lawful

Holding

The suspension was unlawful because the disciplinary process breached fair-hearing safeguards; the allegations were mere allegations of impropriety

Reasoning

The Claimant was invited by letter of 9th August 2019 to a meeting on 12th August 2019, a gazetted public holiday, giving only three days' notice. He was not afforded sufficient time to respond and the safeguards of fair hearing were disregarded. Nothing was shown to be so urgent that a short delay would have harmed the Respondents. The court found the proceedings a rush that generated the ensuing litigation, and held the meeting did not amount to a fair trial in law or under the KNUT constitution.

p. 8
02

Whether due procedure and fair trial principles were followed

Holding

No; the process failed the Rebecca Ann Maina conditions of clear charges, adequate time and disclosure

Reasoning

Applying Ndolo J.'s guidelines in Rebecca Ann Maina, the charges were not clearly put to the Claimant with sufficient time to prepare his defence, and he was not given documents or an opportunity to call witnesses. His request for an adjournment owing to the public holiday and short notice was ignored. The court treated the second issue as covered by the first, answering both negatively.

p. 8
03

Effect of attaining the mandatory retirement age of sixty

Holding

The Claimant's service came to an end by effluxion of time upon attaining age sixty under the KNUT constitution and the Code of Regulations for Teachers

Reasoning

The court agreed with Nduma J. in Joshua O. Ogalo that a union official shall cease to hold office upon attaining sixty years notwithstanding the term of office. Although the suspension was flawed, the Claimant could not remain in office past the retirement age; only the computation of allowances due remained unresolved.

p. 8
04

Remedies and sums payable

Holding

The Respondents admitted owing Kshs. 378,805.80, which was awarded with interest at 14% per annum

Reasoning

By letter dated 20th November 2019 the Respondents admitted owing Kshs. 2,149,939/- between 2018 and 2019, of which Kshs. 1,913,783.50 was paid, leaving Kshs. 378,805.80. The court awarded that balance with interest. No evidence showed the Union's finances were so dire as to justify total suspension of allowances.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Internal disciplinary proceedings require clear charges, sufficient time to prepare a defence, access to relevant documents and the right to call witnesses
  • A union official ceases to hold office upon attaining the age of sixty years notwithstanding the unexpired term of office
  • An employer may initiate disciplinary proceedings for wrongs committed after a court order unless barred by law or a court order, but the process must comply with fair hearing requirements

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Claimant against the Respondents jointly and severally for Kshs. 378,805.80
  2. 2.Interest on Kshs. 378,805.80 at 14% per annum from the date of judgment till payment in full
  3. 3.Costs of the suit on the lower scale to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41 (fair labour practices)
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSection 4(4)
  • Teachers Service Commission Actretirement age provisions
  • Code of Regulations for Teachers, 2015Regulation 161(1)
  • KNUT Constitution, 2015Article III 10; Article X(D)(4); Article XVII(E)/XVIII(E) (vacation of office at age 60)
  • TSC Circular TSC IADM/192/1X/1 (Circular Number 1/2017)attendance of teachers on weekends and school holidays

Cases cited (9)

  • Geothermal Development Company Limited v Attorney General & 3 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Republic v University of Nairobi Ex-Parte Lazarus Wakoli Kunani & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Rebecca Ann Maina & 2 Others v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
    [2014] eKLR
  • Donald C. Avude v Kenya Forest Service
    [2015] eKLR
  • Paul Kiplangat Kirui v Nairobi Water & Sewerage Company Limited
    [2019] eKLR
  • Joshua O. Ogalo v Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) & Another
    [2020] eKLR
  • National Bank of Kenya Ltd. v Pipleplastic Samkolit (K) Ltd & Another
    [2002] EA 503
  • Republic v County Secretary and Head of Public Service, Bomet County & Another Ex parte Bernard Sowek
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenya National Union of Teachers Nakuru Branch & 2 Others v James Mungai Muhia
    [2020] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 41 of the Constitution (fair labour practices); Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes; Rule 21 of the Court's Rules (disposal by written submissions)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Mungai Muhia v Kenya National Union of Teachers & 2 others [2020] KEELRC 63 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Nakuru ELRC Cause No. 68 of 2019 (dealt with within consolidated Nyeri ELRC Cause No. 31 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/63/eng@2020-10-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.