Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated December 22, 2017)· [2019] KEELRC 2562 (KLR)

Dwasi v Cabinet Secretary for Environment and Natural Resources & another (Petition 35 of 2017) [2019] KEELRC 2562 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 November 2019
4,136 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex parte applicant, Dr. Jane Dwasi, moved the court by a notice of motion dated December 22, 2017 seeking an order of mandamus to compel the Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources to appoint and gazette her as chairperson of the National Environment Tribunal pursuant to her nomination by the Judicial Service Commission on an interim basis for one year from September 14, 2017. She had been appointed NET chairperson for a three-year term in July 2014; upon expiry the JSC reappointed her for one interim year to conclude part-heard matters and allow competitive recruitment, but the respondent, advised by the Attorney General and influenced, it was alleged, by the Principal Secretary, refused to gazette her. The applicant argued breach of article 47, the Fair Administrative Action Act and natural justice, alleging lack of notice, no hearing, and bias/nepotism by the Principal Secretary, who had recommended his brother for the position. The JSC, as interested party, maintained that the respondent's role was merely facilitative and that it had no power to reject a nominee. The respondent contended that the interim one-year appointment was contrary to section 125 of EMCA and noted the 2018 amendment removing the JSC's nominating role. The court, having earlier by a ruling of March 2, 2018 countermanded the JSC's interim appointment and installed the applicant in a transitory capacity, found that the interim term had lapsed, the law had changed, and a successor may have been recruited. It declared the application spent and ordered each party to bear their own costs. The substantive complaints of unfair administrative action were not finally determined.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of the respondent's role in appointing the NET chairperson

Holding

The JSC's role was to nominate the chairperson of NET and the respondent's role was merely facilitative, limited to gazetting and appointing the nominee; the respondent had no statutory power to reject a JSC nominee

Reasoning

Section 125(1)(a) of EMCA vested the nomination of the NET chairperson in the JSC, with the respondent's role limited to gazettement and appointment. The JSC maintained, and the respondent's conduct in purporting to reject the nominee on September 25, 2017 and October 13, 2017 usurped the nominating body's mandate. The judgment records the precedent that where one body nominates and another gazettes, the latter's role is merely facilitative. However, the court did not make a final determination because subsequent events rendered the application spent.

p. 4
02

Fair administrative action in the refusal to gazette the applicant

Holding

The applicant argued, but the court did not finally determine, that the respondent's refusal breached article 47(1) of the Constitution, section 4(1) of the FAA Act and natural justice because she was not notified of the complaints or given a chance to respond

Reasoning

The applicant submitted that the respondent failed to notify her of the decision to refuse gazettement, contrary to article 47(1) of the Constitution and section 4(1) of the Fair Administrative Action Act, and alleged bias and tribal/nepotistic influence by the Principal Secretary. The respondent's role was instead said to have usurped the JSC's mandate. The court made no express finding on these complaints, as the application was overtaken by events, including the lapse of the interim appointment and amendment of section 125 of EMCA.

p. 7
03

Whether the mandamus application was overtaken by events

Holding

Yes - the one-year interim appointment had lapsed, the law had changed, and the applicant had already been installed in a transitory capacity by an earlier ruling, rendering the orders sought superfuous

Reasoning

The court noted that the one-year interim appointment had lapsed on September 14, 2018; that the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendment) Act, 2018 had amended section 125(5) of EMCA so that the JSC no longer nominates the chairperson; and that its ruling of March 2, 2018 had appointed the applicant in a transitory capacity pending recruitment of her successor. In these circumstances the mandamus orders sought were superfuous and incapable of being granted, and the application was declared spent.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • An order of mandamus issues only to compel the performance of a statutory or public duty that is lawful
  • A suit may be declared spent where events subsequent to its institution render the orders sought incapable of being granted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated December 22, 2017 is declared spent
  2. 2.Each party shall bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environment Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA)section 125, including 125(1), 125(1)(a), 125(2), 125(4), 125(4)(a), 125(5) and 125(8)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 47 (and article 47(1)); articles 50; article 159
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 4(1)
  • Judicial Service Actsection 10
  • Statute Law Miscellaneous Amendment Act, 2018amendment to section 125(5) of EMCA
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction under article 159 of the Constitution (order of mandamus); not expressly cited by article number in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dwasi v Cabinet Secretary for Environment and Natural Resources & another (Petition 35 of 2017) [2019] KEELRC 2562 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated December 22, 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/2562/eng@2019-11-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.