Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 2nd July, 2018 (within a constitutional petition)· [2019] KEELRC 2446 (KLR)

Daniel Omondi Ogada & 6 others v County Assembly of Homabay & 2 others [2019] KEELRC 2446 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 January 2019
1,849 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court stopped Homa Bay County Assembly from removing Public Service Board members, holding they can only be removed through strict constitutional process.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling by Mathews N. Nduma J in a constitutional petition concerning the threatened removal of members of the Homa Bay County Public Service Board. The applicants, whose six-year contracts had not expired, sought conservatory orders restraining the Respondents from removing them from office, declaring their seats vacant, or recruiting replacements, pending the hearing of the petition. They contended that the removal process initiated by the County Assembly violated Article 251(1) and (2) of the Constitution because it was not commenced by a petition from an independent person, and infringed their rights under Articles 47 and 50 as they were condemned unheard. The County Assembly countered that its committee investigated the Board following motions debated and adopted in plenary, and that the members were examined before the committee. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Gatirau Peter Munya on conservatory orders, and authorities including Mundia Njeru Gateria, Hussein Roba Boru and the County Assembly of Kisumu appeal, the court held that removal of Board members requires Article 251(1) grounds, a petition by a person independent of the Assembly, and a 75% vote under section 58(5)(b) of the County Government Act, with due process strictly followed. Finding merit in the application on the public interest and the protection of an independent body, the court granted the application with costs, confirming that the Board remains in office until the petition is determined or the members' contracts expire.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether conservatory orders should issue restraining removal of County Public Service Board members

Holding

Yes; on the inherent merit of the case and public interest, the conservatory orders were confirmed pending hearing of the petition.

Reasoning

The court, guided by Gatirau Peter Munya, held that at interlocutory stage it should not pronounce on merits but considered the public interest in how independent institutions deal with each other and the proportionate implications of removing members of an independent body en masse on allegations not made in a petition by a party independent of the County Assembly.

p. 4
02

Proper constitutional and statutory procedure for removal of County Public Service Board members

Holding

Removal requires a petition by an independent person on Article 251(1) grounds and a 75% vote under section 58(5)(b) of the County Government Act; the Assembly's own internal motions and committee process did not satisfy this.

Reasoning

Relying on Mundia Njeru Gateria and Hussein Roba Boru, the court held removal must be grounded on Article 251(1) grounds, initiated by petition, with due process strictly complied with; the Assembly's committee investigations and report of 25th June 2018 fell short of this threshold, engaging Articles 47 and 50 rights to be heard.

p. 3
03

Separation of powers and independence of the County Public Service Board

Holding

The Board is independent and cannot be supervised or removed by the executive; the Assembly's oversight must be exercised in accordance with the Constitution.

Reasoning

The court reiterated that the doctrine of separation of powers limits each arm of government; Assemblies' oversight roles must be discharged constitutionally, and impeachment-type provisions must be strictly complied with per the County Assembly of Kisumu case.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Members of a County Public Service Board can only be removed on the grounds in Article 251(1) of the Constitution and by a vote of not less than 75% of all members of the County Assembly under section 58(5)(b) of the County Government Act, 2012.
  • The removal process must be originated by a petition presented to the County Assembly by a person separate and independent of the Assembly.
  • Conservatory orders are public-law orders granted on the inherent merit of the case, considering public interest, constitutional values and proportionate magnitudes, not private-law irreparable harm tests.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is granted with costs
  2. 2.Conservatory orders confirmed: the Public Service Board, Homa Bay County as presently constituted remains in office until the petition is disposed of and/or the members' contracts of service come to an end

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 251(1) and (2)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 47 and 50
  • County Government Act, 2012Section 58(5)
  • County Government Act, 2012Sections 59(1)(f) and 50(5)

Cases cited (5)

  • Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Githinji & 2 Others
    SC Petition No. 2 of 2013
  • Mundia Njeru Gateria v Embu County Government
  • Hussein Roba Boru v County Government of Isiolo & 2 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • County Assembly of Kisumu & 2 others v Kisumu County Assembly Service Board & 6 Others
    (2015) eKLR
  • County Government of Nyeri & Another v Cecilia Wangechi Ndungu
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitutional petition seeking conservatory orders under Article 23 and Articles 251(1)&(2) and 47, 50 of the Constitution as read with section 58(5) of the County Government Act, 2012

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Daniel Omondi Ogada & 6 others v County Assembly of Homabay & 2 others [2019] KEELRC 2446 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 2nd July, 2018 (within a constitutional petition). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/2446/eng@2019-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.