John Muthike Njiru v Mwea Rice Millers Limited [2019] KEELRC 2066 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court dismissed an employee's unfair dismissal claim because he couldn't prove his case, especially after accepting a Labour Office settlement payment.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the dismissal was unfair and wrongful
The Claimant failed to establish unfair dismissal; his absence from work was unexplained, whether attributable to illness or incarceration, and the suit fails on a balance of probabilities
The court found the Claimant was absent from the workplace after being arrested and incarcerated over an unrelated matter, and that he lied about hospitalisation at Embu Hospital. Having failed to report to work and having rejected the Labour Office determination after accepting part payment, the Claimant did not discharge his burden of proving lack of substantive justification or procedural fairness in the dismissal.
Burden of proof in employment claims
The burden lay on the Claimant to prove unfairness of the dismissal, which he failed to do
The court held that the Claimant, who alleged verbal dismissal without notice contrary to Sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, bore the burden of establishing lack of fairness. His absence from work was unexplained and he failed to satisfy the court of the likelihood of the truth of his case, so the claim could not succeed.
Legal principles established
#- An employee alleging unfair termination bears the burden of proving unfairness on a balance of probabilities
Court orders
#- 1.The suit is dismissed
- 2.No order as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act; no specific provision quoted in the judgment)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "John Muthike Njiru v Mwea Rice Millers Limited [2019] KEELRC 2066 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/2066/eng@2019-03-11
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.