Peter Kegode v United Millers Ltd [2019] KEELRC 1991 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court dismissed all claims, confirming employees who refuse lawful orders can be summarily dismissed if given a fair workplace hearing.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Employment period with the respondent
The Certificate of Service confirmed the claimant was employed by the respondent from February 2008, not from 2002
The claimant's Certificate of Service dated 4th September 2015 was annexed to the Memorandum of Claim and was not challenged, while no alternative letters of appointment were produced by the employer. The record was supported by the averments that the claimant worked for Palmac Limited until 2007 when the respondent acquired its assets and liabilities including the claimant as an employee.
Justification of summary dismissal
The summary dismissal was justified as the claimant refused a lawful command and was accorded a hearing as required by sections 41(2) and 44 of the Employment Act
Section 44(4)(e) permits summary dismissal where an employee knowingly refuses a lawful and proper command. The employer must give a hearing under section 41(2), but a shop-floor hearing is not a criminal trial. The claimant was notified of the gross misconduct, heard before the workers committee and staff, and found to have disobeyed lawful instructions, satisfying the legal duty.
Paternity leave entitlement
The claim for paternity leave pay failed for lack of application, notice and evidence of birth
Under section 29(8) of the Employment Act a male employee is entitled to two weeks paternity leave with full pay, but the right matures only upon application, written notice to the employer within a reasonable time and supporting evidence such as a birth certificate. The claimant never applied, never notified the employer and produced no certificate of birth for any child.
Legal principles established
#- Internal disciplinary proceedings are not akin to criminal trials; an employee need only be given a reasonable hearing on the shop floor
- Paternity leave under section 29(8) of the Employment Act is due only upon application, notice and supporting evidence such as a birth certificate
Court orders
#- 1.The claims made are dismissed
- 2.Each party to bear own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Ochieng v Techno Service Limited (Cause 1506 of 2016) [2024] KEELRC 1161 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 1161 (KLR)26 Apr 2024
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Peter Kegode v United Millers Ltd [2019] KEELRC 1991 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No. 137 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1991/eng@2019-02-14
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.