Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedJudicial Review Application, Notice of Motion dated 19th December 2017 (filed 2nd March 2018)· [2019] KEELRC 1709 (KLR)

Republic v Private Security Regulatory Authority & 2 others Ex parte Charles Arori (Chief Shopsteward) G4s & 9 others; Stephen P Nganga (Interested Party) [2019] KEELRC 1709 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya, Judicial Review Division
26 April 2019
3,194 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court cancelled the appointment of an unqualified chairperson to the security regulator, confirming that statutory qualifications for public offices must actually be met.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, private security guards, brought a judicial review motion under sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking certiorari to quash Kenya Gazette Notice No. 6868 of 21st July 2017 appointing Prof. Stephen P. Nganga as Chairperson of the Private Security Regulatory Authority. They contended the appointment violated section 11(3)(c) of the Private Security Regulation Act, which requires 15 years' experience in security matters, the Mwongozo Code of Governance, and a Circular of 3rd February 2016 barring State and public officers from State Corporation boards, since Prof. Nganga was a serving JKUAT employee. They argued the appointment was arbitrary, offended legitimate expectation and proportionality, and deprived some 500,000 security guards of leadership capable of addressing underpayment and poor working conditions under Article 41. The 1st Respondent did not oppose; the 2nd and 3rd Respondents objected on timeliness and abuse of process grounds. The court (Makau J) held that the six-month limitation in Order 53 rule 2 governs only the application for leave, and both the Chamber Summons and the substantive motion were competent. On the merits, the respondents and the interested party offered no evidence controverting the grounds. The court found the appointee an engineer 'clueless in security issues', lacking the statutory qualification, and barred as a serving public officer by the 2016 Circular. The court entered judgment for the applicants, granted the order of certiorari quashing the Gazette Notice, and awarded the applicants costs. Judgment dated 26th April 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competence of the substantive motion (timeliness)

Holding

The application for leave and the substantive motion were both filed within the statutory time limits; the six-month rule governs only the application for leave.

Reasoning

The court held that Order 53 rule 2's six-month limitation period applies to the Chamber Summons seeking leave, not the substantive notice of motion. Once leave is applied for within six months of the impugned decision, the substantive motion need only be filed within 21 days of the grant of leave (or a shorter court-directed period). Leave was applied for on 18.12.2017, granted 12.2.2018, and the motion filed 5.3.2018, within the 21 days.

p. 4
02

Qualification of the appointee under section 11(3)(c)

Holding

Prof. Nganga lacks 15 years' experience in security matters and is therefore unqualified for appointment as Chairperson.

Reasoning

The interested party's CV showed he was an Engineer specializing in Applied Mechanics, Metallurgy and Material Engineering with no training or experience in security issues. Neither the respondents nor the interested party controverted this evidence. He therefore lacked the minimum qualification prescribed by section 11(3)(c) of the Private Security Regulation Act and the Mwongozo Code requirement of relevant qualifications.

p. 4
03

Disqualification as a serving public officer

Holding

The appointment violated the Circular of 3rd February 2016 barring appointment of State and public officers to boards of State Corporations.

Reasoning

The interested party was a full-time employee of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, uncontroverted by the respondents. The Circular of 3rd February 2016, anchored on Article 10(2)(a) of the Constitution and the Leadership and Integrity Act (Cap 182), bars appointments of State and public officers to State Corporation boards except where the establishing instrument provides otherwise.

p. 4
04

Legitimate expectation and fair labour practices

Holding

The unlawful appointment frustrated the applicants' legitimate expectation of better terms and infringed Article 41 fair labour practices, justifying certiorari.

Reasoning

The court accepted that the contraventions were unreasonable, arbitrary and in bad faith, and that the appointment of unqualified leadership stifled the applicants' legitimate expectation that the Authority would formulate licensing policy and regulations addressing underpayment of private security guards, thereby infringing their Article 41 right to fair labour practices.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The six-month limitation in Order 53 rule 2 applies to the application for leave, not the substantive motion; a substantive motion is competent if filed within 21 days of the grant of leave.
  • A person appointed Chairperson of the Private Security Regulatory Authority must have at least 15 years' experience in security matters under section 11(3)(c) of the Private Security Regulation Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of certiorari bringing into the court and quashing Kenya Gazette Notice No. 6868 issued on 21st July 2017 appointing Prof. Stephen P. Nganga as Chairperson of the Private Security Regulatory Authority
  2. 2.Costs of the suit granted to the applicants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law Reform Act (Cap 26)Sections 8 and 9
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 53 Rules 1, 2 and 3
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 2 (definition of suit); Section 3
  • Private Security Regulation ActSections 9, 11(3)(c), 28, 29(d), 30
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 10(2)(a), 40, 41, 159(2)(d), Chapter Six
  • Leadership and Integrity Act (Cap 182)
  • Mwongozo Code of Governance (Addendum)Clause 9 of Chapter 1
  • Circular of 3rd February 2016 on appointments of State and public officers to State Corporation boards

Cases cited (5)

  • Rashid Odhiambo Allogoh & 245 Others v. Haco Industries
    [2015] eKLR
  • Hon. George Saitoti v. Judicial of Enquiry into the Goldenberg Affair
    [2006] eKLR
  • Council for Civil Service Unions v. Minister for Civil Service
    [1985] AC 374
  • Commissioner for Lands & Kunste Hotel Limited
    [1997] eKLR
  • M.M. Ole Keiuwa & Another v. Yash Pal Ghai
    [2002] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act (Cap 26) and Order 53 Rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Private Security Regulatory Authority & 2 others Ex parte Charles Arori (Chief Shopsteward) G4s & 9 others; Stephen P Nganga (Interested Party) [2019] KEELRC 1709 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Judicial Review Application, Notice of Motion dated 19th December 2017 (filed 2nd March 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1709/eng@2019-04-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.