Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Claimant's Statement of Claim dated 3rd September 2018; Respondent's Application dated 11th October 2018)· [2019] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)

Board of Trustees, Kenya Broadcasting Corporation (KBC) Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme (Suing on behalf of the Scheme) v Kenya Broadcasting Corporation [2019] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 May 2019
1,017 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent, Kenya Broadcasting Corporation, brought a notice of motion dated 11th October 2018 seeking dismissal or striking out of the Claimant's Statement of Claim dated 3rd September 2018, together with costs, on the ground that no 30 days' notice of intention to sue had been served on the Managing Director as required by section 46 of the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation Act. The Respondent also argued that some claims did not concern employees' deductions and hence the court lacked jurisdiction. The Claimant, Daniel Okoth, opposed the application through a replying affidavit sworn by himself, asserting that a notice was served on the Managing Director on 25th May 2018 with particulars of the claim, that 30 days were allowed to lapse in anticipation of negotiations, and that the application was an abuse of process and violated Article 159 of the Constitution and the overriding objective. The Claimant further argued that non-compliance with a notice provision should only affect costs, and that the mandatory requirement violated Article 48. Maureen Onyango, J, found from the Claimant's bundle that notice was served on 25th May 2018 and the suit was filed on 4th September 2018, three months later. Holding that section 46 does not prescribe the form of the notice, the court found sufficient compliance, supported by the Court of Appeal's decision in Kenya Broadcasting Corporation v Ann Muthoni Kibiro. Unpleaded arguments and contentious factual issues concerning stamps on the notice were disregarded. The application was dismissed with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the notice of intention to sue served on 25th May 2018 satisfied section 46 of the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation Act

Holding

Yes - the notice was served, particulars were communicated, and the suit was filed three months later, satisfying the one-month notice requirement

Reasoning

The claimant's bundle showed a notice served on 25th May 2018 communicating the intention to sue if payment was not made within 7 days. Section 46 requires at least one month's written notice with particulars before commencing proceedings. The court held the statute does not prescribe the form of the notice and that the service of the notice followed by filing suit three months later was sufficient fulfilment of the requirement.

p. 2
02

Whether the Court of Appeal's decision in Kenya Broadcasting Corporation v Ann Muthoni Kibiro supports a finding of compliance

Holding

Yes - the Court of Appeal held that notice served on the Managing Director before filing suit was sufficient and dismissed the ground on notice

Reasoning

The court cited the Court of Appeal decision where it was held that service of a notice on the Managing Director before filing suit, though perhaps not strictly necessary, satisfied section 46 and that no separate notice was required. The court adopted this reasoning to reject the respondent's argument that the notice was defective.

p. 2
03

Whether arguments not pleaded can be entertained by way of submissions

Holding

No - arguments in paragraphs 17, 18 and 19 and those regarding strange stamps on the notice were not pleaded and were disregarded

Reasoning

The court held that matters raised in submissions but not pleaded in the respondent's pleadings would be disregarded, and further that contentious factual issues such as the alleged strange stamps on the notice required evidence from the parties and could not be canvassed by submissions alone.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 46 of the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation Act does not prescribe the form the notice of intention to sue must take; service of the notice and commencement of the suit after the lapse of at least one month is sufficient compliance
  • Contentious issues of fact requiring evidence cannot be determined on submissions alone

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's Application dated 11th October 2018 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Kenya Broadcasting Corporation Actsection 46
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48

Cases cited (5)

  • Jackson K. Mathenge vs. Kenya Broadcasting Corporation
    [2018] eKLR
  • Jaldesa Tuke Dabelo vs. Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission and Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kenya Bus Service Limited & Another vs. Minister for Transport & 2 Others
    HCCC No. 504 of 2008
  • Pius Mutuku Mueke vs. Managing Director, Kenya Broadcasting Corporation & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kenya Broadcasting Corporation v Ann Muthoni Kibiro and Another
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over the claimant's employment-related claim (the court notes some claims 'do not concern employee's deductions' but did not uphold that objection); Article 159 of the Constitution and the overriding objective invoked against striking out

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Board of Trustees, Kenya Broadcasting Corporation (KBC) Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme (Suing on behalf of the Scheme) v Kenya Broadcasting Corporation [2019] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the judgment (Claimant's Statement of Claim dated 3rd September 2018; Respondent's Application dated 11th October 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1484/eng@2019-05-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.