Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 829 of 2015· [2019] KEELRC 1220 (KLR)

Pius Ngui Ngului v Pemwe Security Services [2019] KEELRC 1220 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
4 July 2019
358 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that an employee who wrote a resignation letter could not later claim unfair dismissal, though his employer still had to pay owed dues.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, Pius Ngui Ngului, filed a Memorandum of Claim on 18/5/2015 before the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi alleging unfair and unlawful termination and seeking terminal dues of Kshs.319,460 plus costs and interest. The Respondent, Pemwe Security Services, denied terminating the Claimant, asserting that he resigned voluntarily by giving three months' notice on 12.7.2014 and ceased employment on 31/10/2014 upon expiry of that notice. Lady Justice Hellen S. Wasilwa considered the evidence and documents and found that the Claimant had indeed tendered a resignation letter dated 12.7.2014 indicating he would cease working for the Respondent on 31.10.2014, which letter the Claimant did not deny writing. On that basis, the court held that the Claimant's assertion of termination was untrue, that he resigned voluntarily, and that his claim for unfair and unjustified termination and related damages could not stand. However, the Respondent had admitted willingness to pay the unpaid October 2014 salary, two years' leave dues and NSSF dues. Relying on that admission, the court entered judgment for the Claimant only for the admitted amounts: Kshs.14,000 for two years' leave, Kshs.5,000 for unpaid October 2014 salary and Kshs.24,000 for unpaid NSSF dues, totaling Kshs.43,000. The Respondent was ordered to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment. The claim was therefore partially allowed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was unfairly and unlawfully terminated

Holding

The claim fails; the Claimant resigned voluntarily by letter dated 12.7.2014 giving notice that he would cease working on 31.10.2014, which he did not deny

Reasoning

The court considered the parties' evidence and documents and found the Claimant tendered a resignation letter dated 12.7.2014 indicating he would cease working for the Respondent on 31.10.2014. The Claimant did not deny writing the letter. Given that acceptance, his assertion that he was terminated was found untrue, defeating the claim for unfair and unjustified termination.

p. 1
02

What terminal dues, if any, are payable

Holding

Judgment entered only for the admitted amounts: 2 years' leave (Kshs.14,000), unpaid October 2014 salary (Kshs.5,000) and unpaid NSSF dues for 60 months (Kshs.24,000), totaling Kshs.43,000, plus costs and interest

Reasoning

The Respondent in its evidence admitted willingness to pay the unpaid October 2014 salary, 2 years' leave dues and 6 months' (60 months per computation) NSSF dues. Based on this admission, the court entered judgment only for the admitted amounts, awarding a total of Kshs.43,000 with costs and interest at court rates from the date of judgment.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim for unfair termination cannot stand where the employee tendered a resignation letter giving notice and has not denied writing it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Claimant only for the admitted amount: 2 years leave Kshs.14,000/=; unpaid salary for October 2014 Kshs.5,000/=; unpaid NSSF dues for 60 months Kshs.24,000/=; total Kshs.43,000/=
  2. 2.Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates with effect from the date of the judgment
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Memorandum of Claim for unfair and unlawful termination)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Pius Ngui Ngului v Pemwe Security Services [2019] KEELRC 1220 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No. 829 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1220/eng@2019-07-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.