Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedELRC Cause (Memorandum of Claim dated 25/11/2016)· [2019] KEELRC 1029 (KLR)

Peter Mutarura Mwaura v CIC Insurance Group Limited [2019] KEELRC 1029 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 July 2019
3,998 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that being pressured to resign counts as dismissal, but the employee still lost because his employer followed fair procedure and had valid reasons.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a long-serving employee who rose to Managing Director/Principal Officer of CIC Asset Management Ltd, claimed he was forced to resign in February 2016 after misreporting the respondent's deposit exposure at Imperial Bank in the wake of the bank's placement under receivership. He attributed the erroneous figure to misleading information from the Investment Manager and alleged that after a disciplinary hearing on 12/02/2016 the Group CEO demanded his car keys and coerced him into writing a two-line resignation letter. He sought a declaration that the resignation was procured by force, one year's salary, three months' notice pay, unpaid February 2016 salary, general damages for intimidation, and alternatively reinstatement. The respondent denied terminating him, contending he negligently failed to scrutinise deposit summaries, authorised deposits exceeding the approved limit, and voluntarily resigned after a board decision to terminate, with the notice requirement waived. The court framed three issues: whether the claimant voluntarily resigned or was constructively terminated; whether due process and valid reasons attended the termination; and remedies. Relying on Rose Mwikali Nzuki v Food for the Hungry Kenya, the court held that the resignation was prompted by the respondent - the disciplinary minutes showed the board agreed to terminate but offered resignation as an option - and was therefore a constructive termination. However, it further found that the respondent followed due process under Section 41 of the Employment Act and had valid reasons, namely the claimant's negligence as Managing Director. Concluding the claim lacked merit, the court dismissed the claim with no order as to costs on 8 July 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant voluntarily resigned or was constructively dismissed

Holding

The claimant did not voluntarily resign but was constructively terminated, since the board had decided to terminate and merely gave him an option to resign

Reasoning

The court relied on Rose Mwikali Nzuki v Food for the Hungry Kenya, holding that a resignation prompted by the employer is not voluntary. The disciplinary minutes showed the board unanimously agreed to terminate the claimant's employment but, given his long service, offered him the opportunity to resign. He opted to resign which the board accepted and waived notice. The resignation was therefore a request from the respondent and amounted to constructive termination.

p. 5
02

Whether the constructive termination followed due process and was for valid reasons

Holding

Due process was followed and there were valid reasons - the claimant was negligent in his duty as Managing Director and was given an opportunity to be heard

Reasoning

The court found that from the disciplinary minutes the respondent had a valid reason to consider termination, namely negligence of duty as Managing Director of CIC Asset Management Limited, having failed to ensure monthly reconciliations and having misled the board on exposure at Imperial Bank. The claimant was issued a show cause letter, responded, attended the disciplinary hearing and answered all allegations, satisfying Section 41 of the Employment Act 2007.

p. 6
03

Remedies

Holding

No remedies awarded because although constructive termination was found, it was procedurally fair and for valid reasons

Reasoning

Having found due process was followed and valid reasons existed for the constructive termination, the court concluded there was no merit in the claimant's case for the reliefs sought, including one year's salary, notice pay, unpaid salary and general damages, and dismissed the claim with no order as to costs.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A resignation is not voluntary if it is influenced or prompted by the employer
  • Where a board decides to terminate but offers the employee an option to resign instead, the resignation is constructive termination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claimant's case is dismissed with no order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 41
  • Employment ActSections 35 and 44
  • Employment ActSection 49 (and 49(4))

Cases cited (9)

  • Rose Mwikali Nzuki v Food for the Hungry Kenya
    [2015] eKLR
  • Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp
    [1978] Q.B 761
  • Coca Cola East & Central Africa Limited v Maria Kagai Ligaga
    [2015]
  • Steve Mutua Munga v Homegrown (K) Ltd & 2 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Edward Machuka Nyamora v Kenya Animal Genetic Resource Centre formerly (Central Artificial Insemination Station)
    [2018] eKLR
  • Julius Michael Ooko v Tata Chemicals Magadi Limited
    [2019] eKLR
  • CMC Aviation Limited v Mohammed Noor
    Civil Appeal No. 199 of 2013
  • Alphonce Maghanga v Operation 680 Ltd
    [2013] eKLR
  • David M. Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission
    2015 SCC 10
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act 2007 (first-instance employment claim)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peter Mutarura Mwaura v CIC Insurance Group Limited [2019] KEELRC 1029 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). ELRC Cause (Memorandum of Claim dated 25/11/2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1029/eng@2019-07-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.