Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedMemorandum of Claim dated 14th April 2015, filed 15th April 2015· [2019] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)

John Odero Omondi Okongo v Christine Omuombo & 3 others (Sued in their capacity as) the Administrators of the Estate of the Late Tom O’ Omuombo) [2019] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
26 July 2019
581 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court dismissed a caretaker's Kshs 4.7 million unfair termination claim because he couldn't prove he was employed or unlawfully fired.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an undefended employment claim filed in the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi by John Odero Omondi Okongo against four respondents sued as Administrators of the Estate of the late Tom O'Omuombo. The Claimant alleged he was employed as a caretaker in October/November 2004 managing a block of flats at Kayole Soweto on an initial monthly salary of Kshs. 7,000, and that his employment was unlawfully terminated on 18th March 2015 by Alpha Achieng via sms, after the deceased employer's children took over the business following his death in about 2007. He sought compensation of twelve months' salary, notice pay, unpaid March 2015 salary, service pay, leave pay, overtime and holiday pay totalling over Kshs. 4.7 million, general damages, a certificate of service, costs and interest. The Respondents filed no response, and the Claimant testified alone and filed written submissions. The Court identified two threshold questions. First, since the Respondents were sued only as administrators, and no probate documents were produced, the Court found no legal connection between the deceased and the Respondents and no basis to pass the deceased's obligations to them. Second, under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act, the burden of proving unlawful termination lies on the employee; apart from his word that termination was by sms, the Claimant adduced no evidence. The Court held the Claimant failed to establish both the employment relationship and unlawful termination, dismissed the entire claim, and made no order for costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an employment relationship was established between the Claimant and the Respondents

Holding

No employment relationship was established; the Respondents were sued as Administrators of the deceased's estate but no probate documents were produced to link them legally to the deceased or his obligations

Reasoning

The Respondents were sued solely in their capacity as Administrators of the Estate of Tom O'Omuombo. However, no probate or letters of administration were placed before the Court. Without such documents the Court could not find any legal connection between the deceased employer and the Respondents, and consequently there was no legal basis for passing the deceased's employment obligations to them.

p. 2
02

Whether the Claimant proved unlawful and unfair termination of employment

Holding

The Claimant failed to discharge the burden of proof under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act; apart from his own word that termination was effected by sms, no evidence of unlawful or unfair termination was presented

Reasoning

Under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act, the burden of proving unlawful and unfair termination rests on the employee. The Claimant testified that his employment was terminated by Alpha Achieng by way of an sms text, but produced no other evidence. His unsupported word was insufficient to discharge the statutory burden, so the claim of unlawful termination failed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 47(5) of the Employment Act places the burden of proving unlawful and unfair termination of employment on the employee
  • Obligations of a deceased employer cannot pass to purported administrators where no probate documents are produced to establish their status

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's entire claim is dismissed with no order for costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 47(5)
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction over a claim of unlawful termination of employment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Odero Omondi Okongo v Christine Omuombo & 3 others (Sued in their capacity as) the Administrators of the Estate of the Late Tom O’ Omuombo) [2019] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Memorandum of Claim dated 14th April 2015, filed 15th April 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/1004/eng@2019-07-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.