Kenya Union Of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Kenya Credit Traders Limited [2019] KEELRC 880 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a trade union that has referred a recognition dispute for conciliation under section 62 of the LRA may file suit under section 74 before conciliation is exhausted
The suit was premature; although section 74 permits urgent referral of recognition disputes without prior conciliation, once conciliation is initiated under section 62 the process must be exhausted before the court is moved, per section 73
The court read sections 73 and 74 of the LRA together. Section 74 allows a union to refer a recognition dispute to court as a matter of urgency without conciliation. However, once the union itself elects conciliation under section 62, section 73 requires exhaustion of that process before court referral, absent the statutory exceptions of unprotected strike/lockout or essential services, none of which applied. Reliance was placed on the Raffia Bags authority.
Legal principles established
#- Once a recognition dispute has been referred for conciliation under section 62 of the LRA, a party must exhaust that process before moving the court under section 73
Court orders
#- 1.The suit is struck out with costs for being premature, the conciliation process before the Labour Cabinet Secretary not having been exhausted
- 2.Costs of the suit to the respondent
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Labour Relations Act, 2007, sections 73 and 74; Industrial Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Union Of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Kenya Credit Traders Limited [2019] KEELRC 880 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No. 316 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/880/eng@2019-09-20
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.