Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 1076 of 2015· [2019] KEELRC 739 (KLR)

Barnabus Munyinyi Mwai v Directline Assurance Company Limited [2019] KEELRC 739 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
18 September 2019
2,169 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer cannot fire a sick worker without a proper medical report, contractual notice, and first considering lighter duties — this employer paid the maximum 12 months' salary.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed on 1st February 2013 as an office assistant earning KShs. 25,000 per month, fractured his right clavicle in a road accident on 2nd February 2015. After hospitalisation and surgery, he resumed duty but on 16th April 2015 was terminated on medical grounds, the Respondent contending he could no longer ride a motor cycle to dispatch correspondence and that his recovery period exceeded the remainder of his contract. The Respondent relied on clause 15A of the contract and the Driver's Code of Conduct, and paid him salary for days worked, one month's salary in lieu of notice, accrued leave days and provident fund dues. The Claimant sued for a declaration of unfair termination, 12 months' salary compensation, service pay, a certificate of service, costs and interest. The court found that the contract required notice of up to 28 days before termination for incapacity and that no such notice was issued; there was no contrary medical report to Dr. Mulimba's; and the Respondent never considered whether the Claimant could perform office administration duties without riding. Following Ndolo J's guidance in Kennedy Nyanguncha Omanga, the court held that termination on medical grounds requires care, a specific medical examination and specific notice, failing which the termination is unfair for want of procedural fairness. The termination was declared unfair and unjustified. The court awarded the maximum 12 months' salary (KShs. 300,000), ordered issuance of a certificate of service, and awarded the Claimant costs plus interest at court rates. The Claimant thus partially succeeded, the service pay prayer not having been granted.

Key legal issues

#
01

Procedural fairness in termination on medical grounds

Holding

The termination was unfair and unjustified because the Respondent had no contrary medical report, gave no contractual notice and did not consider redeployment to lighter duties

Reasoning

The court found the Claimant could no longer ride a motor cycle after fracturing his clavicle, but the contract (clause 15A) required notice of up to 28 days before termination for incapacity, and no such notice was issued. The only medical report (by Dr. Mulimba) did not establish inability to work, and the employer never considered whether the Claimant could still perform office administration duties without riding. Relying on Ndolo J in Kennedy Nyanguncha Omanga, the court held employers must exercise care and sensitivity, obtain a specific medical examination and give specific notice before terminating on medical grounds.

p. 3
02

Remedies for unfair termination

Holding

Maximum compensation of 12 months' salary awarded, plus a certificate of service

Reasoning

Having found the termination unfair and unjustified, the court exercised its discretion to award the maximum 12 months' gross salary as compensation under the applicable employment law framework. The Claimant had already been paid salary for days worked, one month's salary in lieu of notice, accrued leave days and provident fund dues, and had been issued a certificate of service; the court nonetheless directed issuance of the certificate and costs.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Termination of an employee on medical grounds without a specific medical report, without notice and without considering alternative work is unfair

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the termination of the Claimant was unfair and unjustified
  2. 2.Award of 12 months' salary as compensation for the unlawful termination, being KShs. 300,000 (12 x 25,000)
  3. 3.Respondent to issue the Claimant with a certificate of service
  4. 4.Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment

Authorities

#

Cases cited (5)

  • Kennedy Nyanguncha Omanga vs. Bob Morgan Services Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union vs. Rea Vipingo Plantations Limited & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Nicholas Otinyu Muruka vs. Equity Bank Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • Martin Mutwiri Njeru vs. Equity Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Moses Daniel Kyalo vs. Treadsetters Tyres Limited
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance employment and labour relations cause before the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Barnabus Munyinyi Mwai v Directline Assurance Company Limited [2019] KEELRC 739 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No 1076 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/739/eng@2019-09-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.