Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 265 of 2018· [2019] KEELRC 612 (KLR)

Nelson Keshei v Narok County Government & another [2019] KEELRC 612 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nakuru
27 September 2019
2,388 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that an employee who resigns from a fixed-term contract still earns gratuity for every full year actually served.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a former County Executive Committee Member of Narok County Government appointed by letter dated 16th May 2013 on a five-year contract, resigned with effect from 7th February 2017 after serving three years and nine months, citing section 43(5) of the Election Act, 2011 as he intended to contest elections. He claimed gratuity of Ksh.2,354,062.50 under the SRC Gazette Notice of 1st March 2013, computed at 60% of his basic salary of Ksh.281,250 at 31% per year served, plus a certificate of service, costs and interest. The respondents admitted employment but denied entitlement, contending gratuity was payable only at the end of the five-year term, and that under the Human Resource Policy 2016 an officer who voluntarily resigns forfeits retirement benefits; they further cited payments made to Lapfund, a non-contributory scheme. The court framed two issues: entitlement to gratuity and costs. Holding that gratuity is a gratuitous payment payable only as a contractual term, collective agreement or employer practice, the court found the appointment letter expressly provided for service gratuity at 31% of annual basic pay for every year served. The 2016 Policy forfeiture clause was held to govern pensions, not contractual gratuity, and the respondents produced no policy applicable at appointment. Since resignation on notice, accepted by the employer, was lawful under sections 35 and 36 of the Employment Act, gratuity accrued for the three full years served, awarded at Ksh.1,883,250. The claim thus partially succeeded; a certificate of service was ordered and each party directed to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an employee who resigns from a fixed-term contract before its expiry forfeits contractual gratuity for the years served

Holding

The claimant was entitled to gratuity for the full years actually served at 31% of annual basic pay; resignation on notice, accepted by the employer, did not forfeit the accrued entitlement.

Reasoning

The appointment letter expressly provided for service gratuity at 31% of annual basic pay for every year served. The court distinguished gratuity from pension under the HR Policy 2016, and held that the Employment Act permits termination on notice (sections 35 and 36). Since the resignation was voluntary, lawful and accepted, and no other record took away the benefit, gratuity accrued for the 3 full years served, computed at 60% of basic salary.

p. 3
02

Whether the Human Resource Policy 2016 forfeiture clause barred the gratuity claim

Holding

The policy clause relied on governs pensions, not contractual gratuity, and the respondents did not produce the policy applicable at the time of appointment.

Reasoning

The court read the 2016 policy in whole and in context, finding clause D.32 dealt with benefits in the nature of pensions, which are foundationally different from gratuity, a gratis payment founded on contract or employer practice. The respondents also did not submit the prior policy applicable when the claimant was appointed in May 2013, so the forfeiture provision could not defeat the contractual gratuity claim.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Gratuity is not mandatory under the Employment Act; it is payable only as a term of contract, private treaty, collective agreement or employer practice.
  • A party to a fixed-term contract may terminate it on notice under sections 35 and 36 of the Employment Act, and where notice is issued and accepted the contract ends on those terms; requiring completion of the full term to earn gratuity would defeat the statute.
  • Where gratuity is a contractual entitlement at 31% of annual basic pay for every year served, it accrues for the years actually served, not only at the end of the contract term.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claimant is awarded Ksh.1,883,250.00 in gratuity
  2. 2.A Certificate of Service shall issue under section 51 of the Employment Act, 2007
  3. 3.The dues paid shall be subject to the provisions of section 49(2) of the Employment Act, 2007
  4. 4.Each party to pay own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 (employment and labour relations jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nelson Keshei v Narok County Government & another [2019] KEELRC 612 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No. 265 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/612/eng@2019-09-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.