Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedEmployment and Labour Relations Court Cause No. 918 of 2012 (Notice of Motion dated 11th March 2019)· [2019] KEELRC 457 (KLR)

Benter Akinyi Opande v Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET) & another [2019] KEELRC 457 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
25 October 2019
1,476 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court refused to pause a Kshs. 550,535 judgment because the losing party filed its notice of appeal late, so no valid appeal existed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondents/Applicants in Employment Cause No. 918 of 2012 moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 11th March 2019 seeking a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Marete J. delivered on 20th December 2018, in which the Claimant, Benta Akinyi Opande, succeeded against the 1st Respondent, pending an intended appeal. The Applicants offered to deposit the decretal sum of Kshs. 550,535.00 as security and relied on Order 42 Rule 6 and authorities including Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal and National Industrial Credit Bank Ltd v Wasike, contending substantial loss and no inordinate delay. The Claimant opposed through a replying affidavit and submissions, showing she was a woman of means capable of repaying the decretal sum, and relied on Masisi Mwita v Damaris Wanjiru Njeri and related authorities. The court framed two issues: whether there was a lawfully filed appeal, and whether stay ought to be granted. On the first issue, the court found that the Notice of Appeal filed on 11th February 2019 was filed out of the 14 days prescribed by Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules and without leave, and was therefore invalid. Applying the Highlands Paper Mills authority, the court held that in the absence of a valid notice of appeal there can be no appeal, rendering the stay question moot. The court did not venture into the merits of the stay application and dismissed it with costs to the Claimant on 25th October 2019.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a valid appeal exists where the Notice of Appeal was filed out of time and without leave

Holding

The Notice of Appeal filed on 11th February 2019, more than 14 days after the judgment of 20th December 2018, was filed out of time and without leave and is therefore invalid; consequently there is no appeal on record

Reasoning

Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 requires a notice of appeal to be filed within 14 days of the decision. The impugned judgment was delivered on 20th December 2018 and the Notice of Appeal was filed on 11th February 2019, well outside the period and without leave. The applicant had not even applied for extension or admission of the notice out of time. The court adopted the reasoning in the Highlands Paper Mills case that where no valid notice of appeal exists, the question of stay pending appeal is moot.

p. 3
02

Whether an application for stay of execution pending appeal can be granted in the absence of a valid appeal

Holding

No; without a valid notice of appeal there is no appeal, and the court found no reason to delve into the merits of the stay application

Reasoning

Once the foundational requirement of a valid notice of appeal was found wanting, the conditions for stay under Order 42 Rule 6 (substantial loss, security, promptness, arguable appeal) did not fall for determination. Citing the Highlands Paper Mills decision, the court held the question of stay pending appeal to be a moot point and declined to assess the merits of the application, dismissing it with costs to the claimant.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days of the decision appealed against; a notice filed out of time and without leave is invalid and, absent a valid notice of appeal, there is no appeal capable of supporting a stay pending appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for stay of execution pending appeal is dismissed with costs to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 3A, 53, 66
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 42 Rule 6(2), Order 42 Rule 6, Order 51 Rule 1, Order 50 Rule 4
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010Rule 75(1) and (5)

Cases cited (8)

  • Butt Vs Rent Restriction Tribunal
    (1982) KLR 417
  • National Industrial Credit Bank Limited Vs Aquinans Francis Wasike
    Court of Appeal Civil Application No. 238/2005
  • Amal Hauliers Limited Vs Abdulnasir Abukar Hassan
    (2017) eKLR
  • Masisi Mwita Vs Damaris Wanjiru Njeri
    (2016) eKLR
  • Cynthia Achieng Marere Vs Athanas Shibwom Asiavugwa
    (2015) eKLR
  • Utalii Transport Company Limited & 3 Others Vs NIC Bank Limited & Another
    (2014) eKLR
  • Equity Bank Ltd Vs Taiga Adams Company Limited
  • Kenya Union of printing, Publishing, Paper Manufacturers and Allied Workers Vs Highlands Paper Mills Limited
    (2018) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A, 53 and 66 of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 42 Rule 6(2) and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Benter Akinyi Opande v Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET) & another [2019] KEELRC 457 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Employment and Labour Relations Court Cause No. 918 of 2012 (Notice of Motion dated 11th March 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/457/eng@2019-10-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.