Caroline Wambui Karugo v Murang’a County Assembly Service Board [2019] KEELRC 174 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A suspended Murang'a County Assembly officer lost her case because she went straight to court instead of first appealing to the Public Service Commission.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Exhaustion of internal statutory remedies under Section 77 of the County Governments Act
The claim was prematurely presented and untenable because the Claimant should have sought reversal of her suspension through the Public Service Commission
The court found the Claimant validly under suspension per the HR manual, but held her suit premature because Section 77 of the County Governments Act provides a dispute resolution mechanism for County Service Board decisions that must be pursued first. Relying on Shem Okora Onywera, the court held the mechanism is mandatory, not optional, as the Legislature could not intend it to be rendered redundant by party choice.
Legal principles established
#- Where a clear procedure for redress of a grievance is prescribed by Constitution or statute, that procedure must be strictly followed before resorting to court
Court orders
#- 1.The claim is dismissed
- 2.No order as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment claims; suspension pending criminal process assessed against Section 77 of the County Governments Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Caroline Wambui Karugo v Murang’a County Assembly Service Board [2019] KEELRC 174 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/174/eng@2019-12-11
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.