Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 1619 of 2015· [2019] KEELRC 87 (KLR)

Gordon James Oyugi v Gulsan Construction [2019] KEELRC 87 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
22 November 2019
1,076 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer was ordered to pay a driver unfairly dismissed while on sick leave after a workplace snake bite, because no fair procedure was followed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent as a tipper driver, sued for maximum compensation for unlawful and unfair termination and one month's salary in lieu of notice. He testified that he suffered a snake bite in the course of employment along the Merille River–Marsabit Road project in January 2014, was released to seek treatment in Nairobi, and received a letter of termination while on sick leave. The respondent's witness confirmed the snake bite and the grant of seven days' sick leave, and stated the claimant was summarily dismissed in April 2014 for insubordination, having failed to attend a meeting. The court framed the sole issue as whether the summary dismissal was for a valid reason and effected through a fair procedure. It found the dismissal letter did not explain what lawful command the claimant failed to obey, and that no show cause letter or invitation to a disciplinary hearing was issued, breaching Sections 41 and 43 of the Employment Act. Under Section 30, the claimant was entitled to sick leave, more so where the injury arose at work; the employer could have extended leave rather than dismiss. The court held the dismissal violated Sections 30, 36, 41, 43 and 45 of the Act and awarded compensation equivalent to two months' gross salary plus one month's salary in lieu of notice. Using a gross monthly salary of Kshs.25,806, the total award was Kshs.77,418, with interest at court rates from the date of judgment and costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of reason and fairness of procedure for summary dismissal

Holding

The summary dismissal was wrongful and unfair because the respondent failed to demonstrate a valid reason and fair procedure under Sections 41 and 43 of the Employment Act.

Reasoning

The respondent corroborated that the claimant was bitten by a snake in the course of employment and granted only 7 days' sick leave. The dismissal letter cited failure to obey a lawful and proper command without explaining what command was breached. No show cause letter or invitation to a disciplinary hearing was produced, denying the claimant an opportunity to be heard.

p. 1
02

Entitlement to sick leave where injury sustained in the course of employment

Holding

The claimant had a justifiable reason to be treated in Nairobi for the snake bite sustained at work until he recovered.

Reasoning

Under Section 30 of the Employment Act an employee is entitled to at least 7 days' paid sick leave and a further 7 days on half pay per year. Because the injury arose in the course of employment, the leave was more deserved, and the employer's remedy was to extend leave, not dismiss.

p. 1
03

Quantum of compensation

Holding

Compensation equivalent to two months' gross salary plus one month's salary in lieu of notice, totalling Kshs.77,418, based on a gross monthly salary of Kshs.25,806.

Reasoning

The court relied on the claimant's four months' service, his wish to continue working, his non-contribution to the dismissal, and the sympathetic circumstances of a workplace snake bite. RW1 testified the basic monthly salary was Kshs.22,440, and house allowance at 15% raised gross pay to Kshs.25,806.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer has a discretion to extend an employee's sick leave with or without pay but may not summarily dismiss an employee on sick leave without written notice, notice to show cause or invitation to a disciplinary hearing.
  • Sick leave under Section 30 of the Employment Act is more deserved where the sickness or injury was sustained in the course of employment.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the claimant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs.77,418 being the equivalent of three months gross salary
  2. 2.Interest at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full
  3. 3.Costs of the suit to the claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 30
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 36
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 41
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 43
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 45
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 49(1)(c) and (4)

Cases cited (2)

  • Harrison Ephantus Mucoya vs Beveva parts and accessories Limited
    (2015) eKLR
  • Raphael Wellington Okonji vs Sunthesis Limited
    (2012) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gordon James Oyugi v Gulsan Construction [2019] KEELRC 87 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Cause No 1619 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/87/eng@2019-11-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.