Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No. 13 of 2018 (Nakuru) - preliminary objection ruling· [2018] KEELRC 2549 (KLR)

Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Cabinet Secretary, Labour & Social Protection & another [2018] KEELRC 2549 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
3 October 2018
1,527 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on preliminary objections raised by the 2nd respondent, Kenya Export Floriculture, Horticulture & Allied Workers Union, to the claimant's suit and Notice of Motion both filed on 16th July 2018. The claimant challenged Gazette Notice No.157 published by the 1st respondent on 13th June 2018 under section 48 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, directing employers to deduct union dues for the 2nd respondent; it sought a permanent injunction and a declaration suspending or setting aside the Notice. The 2nd respondent objected that the court lacked jurisdiction, was functus officio given prior proceedings culminating in Petition No.4 of 2018 in the Supreme Court concerning the union's registration, and that the suit was an abuse of process given a parallel cause at Nakuru. The court held that the cause of action arose on publication of the Gazette Notice and concerns employment and labour relations, a matter within its jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and section 12 of the ELRC Act. The facts differed from the earlier litigation, so the court was not functus officio over the new facts and grounds, and the authority cited by the 2nd respondent was irrelevant. The objections were dismissed with costs to the claimant and the suit was to proceed on the merits, with parties directed to file responses.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC over challenges to a Gazette Notice issued under section 48 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

The court has jurisdiction since the cause of action relates to employment and labour relations, the forum being conferred under section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011

Reasoning

The claim challenges Gazette Notice No.157 of 13th June 2018 requiring employers to deduct union dues for the 2nd respondent. The cause of action arose on publication of that Notice and concerns employment and labour relations. Such matters fall within the court's statutory mandate under section 12 of the ELRC Act, 2011, read with Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution, and the pendency of the Supreme Court petition on registration does not oust it.

p. 2
02

Functus officio

Holding

The court is not functus officio because the present cause of action rests on new facts - the Gazette Notice of 13th June 2018 - not adjudicated in Employment Appeal No.7 of 2011 or Petition No.4 of 2018

Reasoning

The earlier litigation between the parties concerned the 2nd respondent's registration and progressed to the Supreme Court. However, the claimant now challenges a fresh Gazette Notice published by the 1st respondent on 13th June 2018. New facts and grounds arising after earlier judgments cannot be barred; the claimant cannot be stopped from urging its case on those new facts.

p. 2
03

Abuse of process / multiplicity of suits

Holding

The court found the facts here not similar to Cause No.13 of 2018 (Nakuru) or Petition No.4 of 2018, and rejected the contention that the suit was an abuse of process

Reasoning

The 2nd respondent argued the claimant had filed a parallel cause seeking similar orders and should have moved under it. The court held the facts before it were distinct from the other suits and that the authority cited by the 2nd respondent was irrelevant. The rationale of the Gazette Notice had to be addressed on its merits.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction is conferred by the constitution or statute and must be determined as soon as it is raised, on the evidence before the court.
  • A court is not functus officio where new facts and grounds arise, even if the parties are the same as in prior proceedings.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objections by the 2nd respondent on jurisdiction and functus officio are dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to the claimant
  3. 3.The suit to proceed to hearing on the merits

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 162(2)(a)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011Section 12(1)(d)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 48
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016Rule 17(5)
  • Gazette Notice No.157Deduction of Union Dues Order, 2018 dated 13th June 2018
  • Legal Notice No.95Not stated

Cases cited (2)

  • Owners of Motor Vessel “Lilian S” versus Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited
    [1989] KLR
  • Alvin Kamande Njenga versus Justice Gacheru
    HCCC Misc. Appl. No.86 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution read with section 12(1)(d) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Cabinet Secretary, Labour & Social Protection & another [2018] KEELRC 2549 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 13 of 2018 (Nakuru) - preliminary objection ruling. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/2549/eng@2018-10-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.