Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition (filed in the High Court on 22nd March 2007, transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court on 3rd December 2012; number not stated in the judgment)· [2018] KEELRC 2269 (KLR)

Ellen Nyambura Macharia Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Major Edwin Macharia (Deceased) Svc No. 027108 v Attorney General [2018] KEELRC 2269 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 March 2018
1,747 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded Kshs. 2 million to the family of an Air Force officer unlawfully detained and discharged after the 1982 coup attempt, even 25 years later.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This petition, originally filed in the High Court on 22nd March 2007 by Major Edwin Macharia and later prosecuted by his widow and administrator Ellen Nyambura Macharia following substitution, was transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court on 3rd December 2012. It arose from the August 1982 coup attempt by Kenya Air Force personnel. The late Major, then Officer Commanding Supply Squadron at KAF Nanyuki, was arrested on 7th August 1982, detained at Kamiti and Naivasha prisons for about six months, and released in March 1983 with one month's pay; he was later issued a Certificate of Service stating he had retired on completion of service. He alleged violation of rights to life, personal liberty, freedom from inhumane and degrading treatment, property and employment, and sought declarations, general damages and payment of dues and pension. The Respondent maintained that his commission was lawfully terminated by the Defence Council under Section 17(2) of the Armed Forces Act. The Court framed two issues: limitation of time and entitlement to remedies. It held that although the petition was filed 25 years after accrual of the cause of action, the delay was explainable and excusable given his status as an Air Force officer blamed for the coup. On the merits, the Court found unexplained incarceration and an unsupported discharge amounting to a grave violation of constitutional rights, but no proof of torture. It awarded general damages of Kshs. 2,000,000 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment, dismissed the claim for salaries, allowances, amenities and terminal benefits as unproved, and awarded the Petitioner the costs of the case.

Key legal issues

#
01

Limitation of time in constitutional petitions

Holding

The delay of 25 years in filing the petition was excusable because, as a Commissioned Officer of the Kenya Air Force blamed for the 1982 coup attempt, the petitioner could not have brought action earlier

Reasoning

The Respondent sought striking out on grounds of staleness, relying on High Court decisions that the open time limit for constitutional claims can be abused. The Court accepted that delay requires explanation but found the circumstances of the 1982 coup attempt and the petitioner's detention and discharge made earlier action impossible. It declined to strike out the petition.

p. 3
02

Violation of constitutional rights of a discharged Air Force officer

Holding

Removal from the Armed Forces without due process and for no offence was a grave violation of constitutional rights, warranting general damages of Kshs. 2,000,000

Reasoning

The late Major was detained for six months and discharged on the 'no offence' list. The Court found unlawful incarceration and unsupported discharge violated his rights, considering his loss of livelihood, career stigma and family impact, but found no proof of torture. It exercised its discretion on damages accordingly.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • There is no open licence for a party to come to court late in constitutional petitions; delay must be explained
  • Assessment of damages is a judicial discretion taking into account prevailing conditions and prior decisions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the Petitioner in the sum of Kshs. 2,000,000 being general damages
  2. 2.The amount to attract interest at court rates from the date of delivery of the judgment until payment in full
  3. 3.The claim for payment of salaries, allowances, amenities and terminal benefits dismissed
  4. 4.The Petitioner awarded the costs of the case

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Armed Forces ActSection 17(2)

Cases cited (3)

  • Charles Gachathi Mboko v Attorney General
    [2014] eKLR
  • Wellington Nzioka Kioko v Attorney General
    [2016] eKLR
  • Peter M. Kariuki v Attorney General
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original constitutional jurisdiction (petition transferred from the High Court on 3rd December 2012; Article 23 enforcement of fundamental rights; specific provision not quoted in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ellen Nyambura Macharia Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Major Edwin Macharia (Deceased) Svc No. 027108 v Attorney General [2018] KEELRC 2269 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Petition (filed in the High Court on 22nd March 2007, transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court on 3rd December 2012; number not stated in the judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/2269/eng@2018-03-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.