Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNairobi ELRC Petition No. 88 of 2017· [2018] KEELRC 2136 (KLR)

Kenya Aviation Workers’ Union v Kenya Airports Authority & another [2018] KEELRC 2136 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 April 2018
2,346 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court refused to merge three union disputes and kept a KAA official personally in the case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi determines a preliminary objection dated 8th November 2017 and a notice of motion dated 24th November 2017 filed by the respondents in a petition by the Kenya Aviation Workers Union against the Kenya Airports Authority and Dr. Elizabeth Kalei. The respondents sought two principal reliefs: consolidation of Petition No. 88 of 2017 with Nairobi ELRC Cause No. 2204 of 2015 and Nairobi ELRC Petition No. 48 of 2015, and the striking out of the 2nd respondent's name from the proceedings. The applicants argued that the matters shared common parties, facts and reliefs arising from a Recognition Agreement and Collective Bargaining Agreement, and that multiple suits raised common questions and amounted to an abuse of process. They also contended that Dr. Kalei acted as an agent of a disclosed principal and that Sections 3 and 9 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act barred the suit against her. The petitioner opposed, asserting the matters involved different subject matters, that Cause 2204 of 2015 was concluded and pending contempt proceedings, and that Dr. Kalei was sued for personal constitutional violations. Applying Rule 23 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules and the principles in Joseph Okoyo and Nyati Security Guards, the court found the issues in the three matters distinct and refused consolidation. It also held that Sections 3 and 9 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act do not address staff liability, and that Dr. Kalei's alleged personal violations required trial. Both applications were dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether consolidation was merited under Rule 23 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules

Holding

Consolidation refused because the subject matters, facts and questions of law in the three matters are different.

Reasoning

Rule 23 permits consolidation where a common question of fact or law arises or it is practical and appropriate to proceed simultaneously. The court compared the issues in each matter: the instant petition contests termination of the Recognition Agreement and CBA; Petition 48/2017 concerns refusal to engage in collective bargaining and deduct dues; Cause 2204/2015 concerns failure to deduct dues and implement the CBA for Job Grade 5 employees. Commonality of parties alone is insufficient.

p. 3
02

Whether the 2nd respondent should be struck out on the basis of Sections 3 and 9 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act

Holding

Application to strike out refused; the provisions invoked do not shield staff from suit and her liability is a matter for trial.

Reasoning

The 2nd respondent deposed that she acted on behalf of the 1st respondent under its directions but attached no instructions. Sections 3 and 9 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act merely establish the Authority as a body corporate and vest management in the managing director; they do not address staff liability. Whether she personally violated constitutional rights must be determined by the court after assessing evidence.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Consolidation of suits will be ordered only where common questions of law or fact arise of such importance that the matters can conveniently be disposed of simultaneously

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection dated 8th November 2017 is dismissed
  2. 2.The notice of motion dated 24th November 2017 is dismissed
  3. 3.Costs awarded to the petitioner

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSections 3, 12(3)(viii)
  • Kenya Airports Authority ActSections 3, 9, 13
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) RulesRules 17, 23
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 27, 36, 41, 47

Cases cited (5)

  • Kiama Wangai -vs- John M. Mugambi & Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Muchanga Investments Limited -vs- Safaris Unlimited (Africa) Limited & 2 others
    (2009) eKLR
  • Joseph Okoyo -vs- Edwin Dickson Wasunna
    (2014) eKLR
  • Nyati Security Guards & Services Limited -vs- Municipal Council of Mombasa
    (2004) eKLR
  • Valentine Opiyo & Another –vs- Masline Adhaimbo T/A Ellyams Enterprises
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3 and 12(3)(viii) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; Article 27, 36, 41 and 47 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Aviation Workers’ Union v Kenya Airports Authority & another [2018] KEELRC 2136 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Nairobi ELRC Petition No. 88 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/2136/eng@2018-04-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.