Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No. 361 of 2013· [2018] KEELRC 2120 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Nairobi Sports House Limited [2018] KEELRC 2120 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 April 2018
2,797 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant union sought an order compelling the respondent employer to sign a recognition agreement, to deduct and remit union dues, to refrain from victimising union members, and to engage in collective bargaining, alleging that it had recruited over 51% of the respondent's unionisable employees between July and November 2010. The respondent denied the claim, asserting that check-off forms were never served on it, that only 51 of 149 unionisable employees were genuine members (32%, below the statutory threshold), and that several listed employees denied membership or had left employment. By consent of 23rd June 2014, the court directed a supervised ballot to verify membership; this was eventually conducted on 22nd February 2017 and the Labour Commissioner reported that only 51 employees voted in favour of union representation against 205 opposed, meaning the union failed to obtain a simple majority. In written submissions the claimant did not challenge the ballot and admitted it had not met the recognition threshold under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act, but pressed for accumulated union dues from 117 listed members from 31st July 2011 with interest, and for the pursuit of recognition to continue. The court held that no dues were payable because check-off forms were never served on the employer as required by Section 48(3), relying on the Style Industries decision, and dismissed the claim in toto while reserving the union's right to recruit afresh and submit fresh check-off forms, which the respondent would then be statutorily obliged to honour.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the union met the recognition threshold under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

The union did not meet the threshold; the ballot showed only 51 of over 2,000 unionisable employees voted in favour of union representation, and the claimant admitted it had not met the threshold

Reasoning

A court-supervised ballot conducted on 22nd February 2017 under the parties' consent of 23rd June 2014 returned 49 'Yes' votes in Nairobi and 2 in Mombasa against 205 'No' votes, with two abstentions. The claimant in submissions did not challenge the ballot results and admitted that it did not meet the statutory simple majority threshold for recognition and collective bargaining under Section 54.

p. 5
02

Whether the claimant was entitled to accumulated union dues and interest from 117 alleged members

Holding

No, because the check-off forms were never served on the employer as required by Section 48(3) of the Labour Relations Act

Reasoning

The respondent averred, and the claimant did not deny, that check-off forms were only produced during conciliation meetings and not served on the employer, and that the union ignored the Conciliator's directive to verify staff signatures. Without authentic served check-off forms, the employer had no basis for deduction and therefore held no dues capable of remittance. The court relied on Kenya Union of Hair and Beauty Salon Workers v Style Industries Limited.

p. 5
03

Whether the union's right to pursue recognition survives the failed ballot

Holding

Yes; the dismissal does not bar future recruitment and fresh submission of check-off forms

Reasoning

The court noted that recruitment of union members is a continuous exercise and that the union remains free to recruit and to submit fresh check-off forms in the manner provided by the Act, upon which the respondent would be under a statutory obligation to comply. This was an obiter reservation rather than a grant of relief.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer is only obliged to deduct and remit union dues once check-off forms signed by employees have been served upon the employer in the manner prescribed by Section 48(3) of the Labour Relations Act
  • Recognition of a trade union requires a simple majority of unionisable employees demonstrated through properly served and verified check-off forms

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim is dismissed in toto
  2. 2.The union is not barred from recruiting or submitting fresh check-off forms to the respondent in the manner provided for in the Act

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSection 54(1)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 54
  • Labour Relations ActSection 48
  • Labour Relations ActSection 48(2)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 48(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41

Cases cited (1)

  • Kenya Union of Hair and Beauty Salon Workers -vs- Style Industries Limited and Another
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over trade union recognition disputes under the Labour Relations Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Nairobi Sports House Limited [2018] KEELRC 2120 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 361 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/2120/eng@2018-04-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.