Simon N. Mwaniki & 25 others v Permanent Secretary Ministry of Defence & 3 others [2018] KEELRC 1491 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court ruled 26 Ministry of Defence employees were denied fair hearings during disciplinary action and awarded each Kshs. 500,000 in damages plus withheld pay.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Petitioners were discriminated against contrary to Article 27
Discrimination claim fails; Petitioners did not show they were treated differently from a comparable group
The Court adopted the definition of discrimination from Blacks Law 9th Edition, noting that discrimination envisages treating one group differently or preferentially against another under similar circumstances. The Petitioners did not point to what they were subjected to as opposed to a different group under similar circumstances, so the claim was not founded.
Whether the disciplinary process violated Articles 41, 47 and 50 (fair hearing and fair administrative action)
Yes - the Petitioners were subjected to a flawed disciplinary process; an oral hearing was necessary and not accorded
The Court examined the circumstances of the disciplinary process and held that an oral hearing would have made a difference, allowing the Petitioners to explain when and where they sat trade tests and why they believed their certificates were authentic. Although the PSC discipline manual required notice and opportunity to respond, those procedures did not meet constitutional standards on fair administrative action. The right to a fair hearing was mandatory.
Entitlement to withheld salaries during interdiction
Interdiction was proper as an interim measure, but upon lifting of the interdiction all withheld salaries and allowances were to be restored, except for dismissed Petitioners
The Court found interdiction during investigation permissible under the Public Service Commission Manual, which provides that a public officer on interdiction is entitled to half basic salary and that upon lifting of interdiction any withheld salary, allowances and benefits are restored from the date withheld. The dismissed Petitioners were excluded from this entitlement.
Whether failure to appeal to the Public Service Commission bars the claim
Non-exhaustion of the appeal did not cure the constitutional violation; the right to a fair hearing was still not accorded
Although the Petitioners were given an opportunity to appeal to the Public Service Commission within six weeks and did not prove that they appealed, the Court nonetheless found that their right to a fair hearing had not been accorded, and granted declarations and damages notwithstanding.
Legal principles established
#- A person alleging contravention of constitutional rights must set out the right infringed and the manner of infringement
- The necessity of an oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings depends on the subject, nature of the dispute and circumstances of the case
- The Constitution binds all persons and state organs even where the Employment Act does not apply to the armed forces
Court orders
#- 1.Declaration that the Petitioners' rights under Articles 41, 47 and 50 of the Constitution were infringed upon
- 2.Petitioners to be paid all dues withheld during the interdiction period except Petitioners No. 10th, 20th, 22nd, 24th and 25th who were dismissed
- 3.Each Petitioner to be paid Kshs. 500,000 as damages for breach of their constitutional rights
- 4.Costs of the Petition to be borne by the Respondents
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 41, 47 and 50 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under Cause No. 97 of 2015 (petition for violation of fundamental rights and freedoms)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Simon N. Mwaniki & 25 others v Permanent Secretary Ministry of Defence & 3 others [2018] KEELRC 1491 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 97 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/1491/eng@2018-06-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.