Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2018] KEELRC 1428 (KLR)

Moses Osore v Cobra Security Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 1428 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 July 2018
2,503 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer must pay an injured guard's work injury dues directly and cannot pay below the statutory minimum wage, whatever the contract says.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a night guard employed by the Respondent security company to guard a TAWASCO water treatment plant, was attacked by thugs on the night of 20th December 2014 and hospitalised for four days. He sued for negligence in failing to provide equipment and a second guard, the WIBA assessment of Kshs. 46,135/-, underpayment for 13 months, annual leave, overtime, house allowance, NHIF and NSSF remittances, and a certificate of service. The Respondent contended he deserted duty on 1st June 2015, that a conciliation settlement was reached on 2nd September 2015, and that the WIBA claim was with the insurers. The Claimant testified he earned about Kshs. 6,000/- monthly, worked alone at night without equipment, and was never returned to work or paid his dues. The Respondent's branch manager confirmed the wage, the absence of a sword or raincoat, and that no certificate of service was issued. The court held that WIBA dues are payable through the employer, who is the insured, and ordered payment within 14 days failing which summary recovery with commercial-rate interest would lie. It found the Claimant entitled to the statutory minimum wage for a night watchman in Nyeri, overtime for 4 extra hours daily (rest days not being compensable), service pay for one year, compensation capped at 8 months' pay (Kshs. 90,400/-), a certificate of service, costs, and interest. Judgment was entered for the Claimant on those heads on 11th July 2018.

Key legal issues

#
01

Liability for the WIBA assessment where the insurer is not a party

Holding

The Respondent is liable to pay the WIBA dues, with summary recovery against it if unpaid within 14 days

Reasoning

The court found the Claimant was injured in the course of duty and was never paid his WIBA dues despite assessment. Because the payment under WIBA normally flows through the employer, who is the insured, it was mischievous to direct the employee to follow up with the insurer. The employer was therefore ordered to pay within 14 days failing which the sum is recoverable summarily with interest at commercial rates.

p. 2
02

Underpayment against the statutory minimum wage

Holding

The Claimant was underpaid; he was entitled to the statutory minimum for a night watchman in Nyeri

Reasoning

The Respondent's own witness confirmed the Claimant earned about Kshs. 6,000/- per month. Under the Regulation of Wages (General)(Amendment) Order 2015, a night watchman in Nyeri was entitled to Kshs. 11,330/-, inclusive of house allowance unless stated otherwise. The court awarded the difference between what was earned and the statutory minimum from May 2014 to the last month of service in October 2015.

p. 2
03

Overtime and rest days

Holding

The Claimant worked a 6-day week with 4 extra hours daily; the 4 days off per month could not compensate overtime

Reasoning

The Respondent's witness confirmed the Claimant reported at 6.00pm and worked to 6.00am with one day off weekly, said to compensate the extra hour from 5-6, and that 4 days off monthly compensated extra hours. The court held rest days are a separate entitlement and cannot substitute for overtime pay, awarding overtime at 4 hours per day at the hourly rate for a night watchman in Nyeri as a former municipality.

p. 2
04

Desertion versus failure to return to work

Holding

After the injury the Claimant was not returned to work; the claim that he absconded did not defeat the award of compensation

Reasoning

The court noted the competing accounts: the Claimant said he was told to report back after healing and would be re-employed; the Respondent said he deserted and was uncooperative. The court found it clear that after the injury the Claimant was not returned to work, and went on to award compensation capped at 8 months' pay.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • WIBA dues are payable to an injured employee through the employer, which is the insured; the employee cannot be made to follow up with the insurer directly
  • An employee is entitled at the least to the statutory minimum wage notwithstanding any lower contractual wage agreed
  • Rest days cannot be treated as compensation for overtime worked
  • Registration of an employee under NSSF does not exempt an employer from liability where statutory dues have not been remitted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Payment of WIBA claim per the assessment made, in default within 14 days attracting commercial rates of interest from date of filing suit till payment in full
  2. 2.Payment of the difference between the 6,000/- earned and the amounts in the Regulation of Wages (General)(Amendment) Order 2014 and the difference between 6,000/- and Kshs. 11,300/- for the months between May 2014 and October 2015
  3. 3.Compensation of Kshs. 90,400/- being 8 months' pay
  4. 4.Payment of overtime worked at the rate of 4 hours in a day multiplied by the hourly rate for a night watchman in Nyeri
  5. 5.Costs of the suit
  6. 6.Interest on the sums in ii, iii, iv and v at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full
  7. 7.Certificate of service

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 47(5)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA)Not specified
  • Regulation of Wages (General)(Amendment) Order 2015Minimum wage for night watchman in Nyeri
  • Regulation of Wages (General)(Amendment) Order 2014Minimum wage differentials

Cases cited (5)

  • Kenfreight (E.A) Limited v Benson K. Nguti
    [2016] eKLR
  • Tirus Kariuki Mungai v Postal Corporation of Kenya
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kennedy Mutinda Nzoka v Basco Product (Kenya) Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • Daniel Kiplagat Kipleibut v SMEP Deposit Taking Micro Finance Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • Banking Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya) v Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act; Work Injury Benefits Act claim for injuries in course of employment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Moses Osore v Cobra Security Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 1428 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/1428/eng@2018-07-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.