Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition No 22 of 2017· [2018] KEELRC 1145 (KLR)

Naomi Connie Lusiche v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited [2018] KEELRC 1145 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
21 September 2018
2,361 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed the Fair Administrative Action Act applies to private employment, but employees must exhaust internal appeals before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a motion dated 16th March 2017 the petitioner, a former head of Agency Banking whose employment was terminated on 9th March 2017, sought leave to waive the internal appeal requirement under section 9(4) of the Fair Administrative Action Act, a stay of her dismissal and interlocutory reinstatement, and an injunction restraining the respondent bank from charging commercial interest rates on her staff housing loan over King'ong'o Block 21/1723 Eldoret Municipality or from listing her with credit reference bureaux or alienating the property. She alleged violations of the right to fair administrative action under article 47 of the Constitution and the FAA Act, and breach of her legitimate expectation of staff interest rates. The respondent, through a replying affidavit of its employee relationship manager, opposed the application, arguing that termination under a private employment contract is not administrative action, that the staff manual bound the petitioner, and that reinstatement could not be ordered interlocutorily. The court held that the FAA Act applies to private contracts including employment contracts since the Bill of Rights binds all persons. However, section 9(2) of the FAA Act, being mandatory, could not be waived; the petition was stayed pending the filing, hearing and determination of an internal appeal within 60 days. Reinstatement was refused at the interlocutory stage absent exceptional and compelling circumstances. Following Boniface Lum Amunga Biko v NBK, the loan interest remains at staff rates pending determination of the petition. The matter was set for mention on 15th November 2018 for further directions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicability of the FAA Act to private employment contracts

Holding

The FAA Act applies to private contracts including employment contracts because the Bill of Rights binds all persons

Reasoning

The FAA Act gives effect to article 47 of the Constitution, which sits in the Bill of Rights. Article 20(1) provides that the Bill of Rights binds all state organs and all persons, and article 41 on fair labour practices is a component of the Bill of Rights. Section 2 of the FAA Act defines administrative action to include any act, omission or decision of any person or body affecting legal rights or interests. Fairness of termination procedure under sections 41-47 of the Employment Act reinforces this conclusion.

p. 3
02

Whether the court may waive the internal appeal requirement

Holding

The court cannot waive the exhaustion requirement under section 9 of the FAA Act

Reasoning

Section 9(2) is couched in mandatory terms and leaves no room for judicial discretion, so an order waiving the internal appeal process is incapable of being granted. Instead the court stayed the petition to allow the petitioner to pursue the internal appeal against her dismissal within 60 days.

p. 3
03

Interest rate on the staff housing loan pending trial

Holding

The loan interest remains at staff rates pending determination of the petition, following Boniface Lum Amunga Biko v NBK

Reasoning

The court was persuaded by the decision of Mbaru J in Boniface Lum Amunga Biko v NBK [2017] and held that converting the loan from staff rate to customer rate pending the petition would be premature; the staff rate therefore applies pending hearing and determination of the petition.

p. 3
04

Interlocutory reinstatement pending the petition

Holding

Reinstatement is not granted at the interlocutory stage absent exceptional and compelling circumstances

Reasoning

Concurring with counsel for the respondent, the court held that reinstatement is an order to be made in a proper case after full trial on the merits, and only at the interlocutory stage where exceptional and compelling circumstances exist or where a termination defies a court order.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The Fair Administrative Action Act applies to private contracts including contracts of employment
  • Under section 9(2) of the FAA Act internal appeal and review mechanisms must be exhausted before judicial review, and the provision is mandatory
  • Interlocutory reinstatement is available only in exceptional and compelling circumstances

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The prayer for waiver of the internal appeal requirement under section 9(4) of the FAA Act is refused; the order is incapable of being granted
  2. 2.The petition stands stayed pending the filing, hearing and determination of an appeal against the petitioner's dismissal, to be done within 60 days of the order
  3. 3.The interest rate on the staff housing loan remains at staff rates pending the hearing and determination of the Petition
  4. 4.Mention on the 15th day of November, 2018 for further directions on hearing and disposal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 9(4)
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 4(1), 4(3)(e), 4(3)(f), 4(4)(d), 5
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 2
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 9(2)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 47
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 19(2)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 20(1)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 41
  • Employment ActPart VI, sections 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47

Cases cited (3)

  • Jacinta Sekoh Ochieng Vs KPC Ltd
    [2017] eKLR
  • Loice Mutai Vs KRA
    [2017] eKLR
  • Boniface Lum Amunga Biko Vs NBK
    [2017]
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Naomi Connie Lusiche v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited [2018] KEELRC 1145 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Petition No 22 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/1145/eng@2018-09-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.