Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 2014 of 2013· [2018] KEELRC 979 (KLR)

James Muthoka Mwaniki v Kenya Builders & Concrete Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 979 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
2 October 2018
1,338 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed as a Driver from 12 April 2009, sued the Respondent for unfair termination and non-payment of terminal dues and compensatory damages. He alleged that in April 2013 he was sacked over allegations of submitting false mileage for vehicle KAG 322W without a disciplinary hearing, despite having responded to a show cause letter. The Respondent denied the claim, asserting the Claimant falsified mileage records causing a diesel loss of 2,087.33 litres valued at Kshs. 198,296.70, that he never responded to the show cause letter, and that he and his turn boy assaulted the Personnel Manager, leading to a pending criminal case at Makadara. The court framed three issues: whether the Claimant was dismissed, whether there were valid reasons and due process, and entitlement to remedies. On the first issue, the court held that the Respondent's admission that its security expelled the Claimant from the premises amounted to an oral dismissal. On the second, the court found the computer-generated diesel records unreliable - unsigned, with an unknown author - and held that although the Respondent had grounds against the Claimant, these were never tested through a disciplinary hearing, rendering the dismissal unfair and unjustified under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act 2007. The court awarded notice pay, unpaid salary for April and part of May 2013, and 8 months' salary as damages for unfair dismissal, totalling Kshs. 170,292, with costs and interest. The claim partially succeeded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was dismissed

Holding

Expulsion from the premises by the Respondent's security amounted to an oral dismissal

Reasoning

The Respondent's own witness admitted that after the show cause letter the Claimant and turn boy were expelled from the company premises and no further action was taken. The court treated this admission as conclusive of an oral dismissal, regardless of whether the Respondent characterised it as merely sending the employee away to cool down.

p. 2
02

Whether there were valid reasons and due process

Holding

The dismissal was unfair and unjustified under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act 2007 because the alleged reasons were never tested through a disciplinary hearing

Reasoning

Although the Respondent alleged mileage falsification and violence against the Personnel Manager, these reasons required proof through a disciplinary process. The computer-generated diesel records (Appendix 4) bore no signatures, had an unknown author and were not shown to originate from the Respondent's data. After expulsion no further action was taken, so the dismissal lacked fair procedure.

p. 2
03

Whether the Claimant is entitled to remedies

Holding

The Claimant was awarded notice pay, unpaid salary and 8 months' salary as compensation for unfair dismissal

Reasoning

Having found the dismissal unfair, the court exercised its discretion to award one month's salary in lieu of notice, unpaid salary for April 2013 and 1–16 May 2013, and the equivalent of 8 months' salary as damages for unfair dismissal, totalling Kshs. 170,292, plus costs and interest.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Expelling an employee from the employer's premises without further recourse to due process amounts to an oral dismissal
  • A dismissal without a disciplinary hearing is unfair under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Payment of 1 month salary in lieu of notice of Kshs. 16,167
  2. 2.Payment of unpaid salary for April 2013 of Kshs. 16,167
  3. 3.Payment of unpaid salary from 1st to 16th May 2013 of Kshs. 8,622
  4. 4.Payment of 8 months' salary as damages for unfair dismissal of Kshs. 129,336
  5. 5.Total award of Kshs. 170,292
  6. 6.Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at Court rates from the date of judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act 2007Section 45(2)
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act over employment disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Muthoka Mwaniki v Kenya Builders & Concrete Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 979 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 2014 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/979/eng@2018-10-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.