Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated on the face of the extract· [2018] KEELRC 807 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Kenya Planters Co-operative Union [2018] KEELRC 807 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
16 October 2018
2,777 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Nairobi's Employment Court confirmed payment to 66 wrongfully declared redundant workers using a Labour Officer's computation after the parties failed to agree on the amounts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Maureen Onyango J) confirming the computation of sums due under an earlier judgment delivered on 19th December 2011 by Madzayo J, which declared the redundancy of 66 employees wrongful and illegal and ordered payment of their entitlements, twelve months' salary compensation for wrongful redundancy, and issuance of certificates of service. The parties disagreed on the computation: the claimant computed the total at Kshs.39,026,960.28 while the respondent computed Kshs.5,519,666.70. By an application dated 14th September 2015, the claimant sought adoption of its own computation. Because the parties could not agree, on 30th January 2018 the court referred them to the County Labour Officer, Nyayo House, Nairobi, to assist in computing the sums due to each grievant. The Labour Officer's report dated 14th May 2018 was filed on 23rd May 2018. On 11th July 2018 the claimant agreed with the computation; the respondent also agreed with the tabulation but sought a month to identify persons already paid. The respondent subsequently failed to appear or to file the affidavit for which leave had been granted. On 16th October 2018 the court adopted the Labour Officer's tabulation and confirmed the amounts due to each of the 66 grievants, with a certificate of service for each. The respondent was left at liberty to move the court if it established that any grievant had already been paid. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Computation and confirmation of terminal dues under a redundancy award

Holding

The court adopted the County Labour Officer's tabulation and confirmed the amounts due to each of the 66 grievants, including notice, gratuity, salary arrears, 12 months' salary compensation, transport, prorata leave and other heads per grievant

Reasoning

Following the 2011 judgment declaring the redundancy of 66 employees wrongful and illegal, the parties disagreed on computation. The court referred the computation to the County Labour Officer, whose report was filed on 23rd May 2018. The claimant agreed with the tabulation; the respondent also agreed but sought time to identify persons already paid, then failed to appear or file the affidavit for which leave had been granted. The court therefore adopted the report and confirmed the amounts per grievant.

p. 2
02

Issue of certificates of service

Holding

Each of the 66 wrongfully declared redundant employees is entitled to a certificate of service

Reasoning

The original award of 19th December 2011 directed that all 66 employees be issued with certificates of service. The claimant renewed the prayer in its application dated 14th September 2015, and the confirmed tabulation for each grievant ends with 'Certificate of service', operationalising the original order.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Where parties fail to agree on the computation of an award, the court may refer the computation to the County Labour Officer and adopt the resulting report where the parties agree with it or fail to challenge it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The tabulation contained in the report of the County Labour Officer adopted and the amounts due to each of the 66 grievants confirmed pursuant to the award of 19th December 2011
  2. 2.All 66 employees to be issued with certificates of service
  3. 3.The respondent is at liberty to move the court for appropriate orders should it find that any of the grievants has already been paid
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction; enforcement/execution of the court's own award of 19th December 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Kenya Planters Co-operative Union [2018] KEELRC 807 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated on the face of the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/807/eng@2018-10-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.