Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition No 36 of 2018· [2018] KEELRC 723 (KLR)

Francis Amina Juma v Registrar of Trade Union & another [2018] KEELRC 723 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
2 November 2018
7,317 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~29 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a union election challenge, ruling that statutory objection procedures must be followed before filing a constitutional petition.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioner, a purported member of the Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers Union (KPOWU) employed at Kenya Pipeline Company, petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court seeking declarations that the 2nd respondent was ineligible for and fraudulently procured election and registration as National General Secretary, Coast Branch Secretary and Deputy General Secretary; that the Registrar of Trade Unions violated his constitutional rights; that the Coast Branch bank account at National Bank of Kenya was fraudulently opened and misused; and sought nullification, deregistration, injunctions, accounts and damages. The 1st respondent (Registrar) contended she acted lawfully and in compliance with a consent order in Cause No. 2429 of 2017, that no statutory objection or appeal was lodged within 30 days, and that the petition was a disguised appeal. The 2nd respondent denied ineligibility, asserted the petitioner was not a union member (his job grade J.G. 6 excluded him and his name was allegedly fraudulently inserted in the membership list), and maintained the branch account was properly authorized and audited. The court framed five issues and held that the 2nd respondent was eligible under Section 31 of the Labour Relations Act and Rule 11:9 of the Union's constitution, which exempts union staff from the non-member conditions; that the petition circumvented the statutory objection and appeal procedure under the Labour Relations Act; that the bank account was duly resolved and authorized and no misuse of funds was proved; and that no violation of Articles 27, 41 or 47 was demonstrated. The petition was dismissed in its entirety with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents on 2nd November 2018 (Maureen Onyango J).

Key legal issues

#
01

Eligibility of the 2nd respondent to hold the office of General Secretary

Holding

The 2nd respondent was eligible both under the Labour Relations Act and the Union's constitution, having worked in the sector and being a union employee

Reasoning

Section 31(1) of the Labour Relations Act requires officials to be persons engaged or employed in the sector. Section 31(4)(a) permits the general secretary to be a person not engaged in the sector. Rule 11:9 of the Union's constitution exempts union staff from the membership conditions for non-members. The 2nd respondent worked at a petrol station for two years and for the union since 2004, making him eligible. No objection on eligibility had been raised with the Registrar within 30 days as required by law.

p. 8
02

Whether the petition is a disguised appeal circumventing the Labour Relations Act

Holding

Yes - the court's jurisdiction should have been invoked by way of appeal against the Registrar's decision, and the petition was filed to avoid the statutory objection process

Reasoning

The petitioner never lodged an objection with the Registrar over the election or registration of the 2nd respondent within the 30 days required by Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act. Relying on the respondents' authorities, the court found the statutory scheme (Labour Relations Act) should not be circumvented by a direct constitutional petition. The same eligibility issue had already been dismissed as premature in Petition No. 1 of 2018 (Makau J).

p. 9
03

Whether the Coast Branch bank account was fraudulently opened and funds misused

Holding

The allegations were unfounded and unproved

Reasoning

The Union's own constitution (Rule 18:3) provides for branch bank accounts. Minutes of 21st June 2014 resolved to open the account with the Branch Secretary, Chairman and Treasurer as signatories, and the then National General Secretary authorized the opening. The petitioner annexed statements but did not identify any unauthorized withdrawal. The allegations of fraudulent opening and misuse of funds were therefore not proved.

p. 9
04

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights (Articles 27, 41, 47) were violated

Holding

No violation was established

Reasoning

The petitioner did not prove his letter of interest was received by the 2nd respondent, did not follow up, and did not rebut the averment that he was not a union member by virtue of his job grade at Kenya Pipeline Company. The Registrar responded to complaints by letter dated 8th March 2018, so there was no violation of fair administrative action; rejection of a complaint is not ignoring it. Registration of the 2nd respondent did not demonstrate discrimination against the petitioner.

p. 10

Legal principles established

#
  • Challenges to a Registrar of Trade Unions' decision to register an official must be brought by way of objection to the Registrar and appeal within 30 days under the Labour Relations Act, not by constitutional petition
  • Under Rule 11:9 of the Union's constitution, the eligibility conditions for non-members do not apply to union employees, who may contest the posts of National General Secretary or Deputy General Secretary
  • A party can only be accused of violating another's rights if they are aware of the rights; without proof of receipt of the letter, no violation of the right to participate in elections was established

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the entire petition with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 27, 36, 41, 47
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Sections 4(1)-(2), 30, 31(1), (4), (5), 33, 34(1), (2)(a), (4), (5), 50, 82(1), (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure RulesRule 10(2)(c)
  • Trade Unions RegulationsRegulations 13(1) and 13(2)

Cases cited (6)

  • S. K. MACHARIA -V- KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK AND OTHERS
  • THE OWNERS OF THE MOTOR VESSEL LILIAN 'S' -V- CALTEX A.C. (KENYA) LIMITED
    [1989] KLR 1
  • JOSEPHAT NDIRANGU VS HENKEL CHEMICALS (EA) LTD
    (2013) eKLR, Mombasa Industrial Court Petition 1 of 2013
  • SMW -V- GMK
  • JOHN KIMANI MWANIGI -V- TOWN CLERK KANGEMA
    unreported
  • TRUSTED SOCIETY OF HUMAN RIGHTS ALLIANCE VERSUS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OTHERS
    Nairobi Petition No. 229 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (Bill of Rights enforcement jurisdiction); Labour Relations Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Francis Amina Juma v Registrar of Trade Union & another [2018] KEELRC 723 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Petition No 36 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/723/eng@2018-11-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.