Francis Amina Juma v Registrar of Trade Union & another [2018] KEELRC 723 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a union election challenge, ruling that statutory objection procedures must be followed before filing a constitutional petition.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Eligibility of the 2nd respondent to hold the office of General Secretary
The 2nd respondent was eligible both under the Labour Relations Act and the Union's constitution, having worked in the sector and being a union employee
Section 31(1) of the Labour Relations Act requires officials to be persons engaged or employed in the sector. Section 31(4)(a) permits the general secretary to be a person not engaged in the sector. Rule 11:9 of the Union's constitution exempts union staff from the membership conditions for non-members. The 2nd respondent worked at a petrol station for two years and for the union since 2004, making him eligible. No objection on eligibility had been raised with the Registrar within 30 days as required by law.
Whether the petition is a disguised appeal circumventing the Labour Relations Act
Yes - the court's jurisdiction should have been invoked by way of appeal against the Registrar's decision, and the petition was filed to avoid the statutory objection process
The petitioner never lodged an objection with the Registrar over the election or registration of the 2nd respondent within the 30 days required by Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act. Relying on the respondents' authorities, the court found the statutory scheme (Labour Relations Act) should not be circumvented by a direct constitutional petition. The same eligibility issue had already been dismissed as premature in Petition No. 1 of 2018 (Makau J).
Whether the Coast Branch bank account was fraudulently opened and funds misused
The allegations were unfounded and unproved
The Union's own constitution (Rule 18:3) provides for branch bank accounts. Minutes of 21st June 2014 resolved to open the account with the Branch Secretary, Chairman and Treasurer as signatories, and the then National General Secretary authorized the opening. The petitioner annexed statements but did not identify any unauthorized withdrawal. The allegations of fraudulent opening and misuse of funds were therefore not proved.
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights (Articles 27, 41, 47) were violated
No violation was established
The petitioner did not prove his letter of interest was received by the 2nd respondent, did not follow up, and did not rebut the averment that he was not a union member by virtue of his job grade at Kenya Pipeline Company. The Registrar responded to complaints by letter dated 8th March 2018, so there was no violation of fair administrative action; rejection of a complaint is not ignoring it. Registration of the 2nd respondent did not demonstrate discrimination against the petitioner.
Legal principles established
#- Challenges to a Registrar of Trade Unions' decision to register an official must be brought by way of objection to the Registrar and appeal within 30 days under the Labour Relations Act, not by constitutional petition
- Under Rule 11:9 of the Union's constitution, the eligibility conditions for non-members do not apply to union employees, who may contest the posts of National General Secretary or Deputy General Secretary
- A party can only be accused of violating another's rights if they are aware of the rights; without proof of receipt of the letter, no violation of the right to participate in elections was established
Court orders
#- 1.Dismissal of the entire petition with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (Bill of Rights enforcement jurisdiction); Labour Relations Act, 2007
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Francis Amina Juma v Registrar of Trade Union & another [2018] KEELRC 723 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Petition No 36 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/723/eng@2018-11-02
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.