Joseph Mungai Keriko v Kirinyaga University College [2018] KEELRC 633 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A voluntary resignation deal ends disciplinary action and limits both sides, but the employee still keeps earned dues.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the termination was unfair or unlawful notwithstanding the pending disciplinary process
The termination was not unfair or unlawful because the parties voluntarily agreed to separate through a resignation agreement which bound them
The Court found that both parties, fully aware of the disciplinary findings and allegations against the claimant, evaluated their positions and agreed to separate through the claimant's resignation and its acceptance. Applying the 'soft landing' principle in Malachi Ochieng Pire, parties who opt to separate by resignation agreement surrender their strict positions and are bound by that agreement without further rights or obligations. No factor diminishing the claimant's free will was established.
Whether reinstatement or pay for unexpired term is available
Both prayers fail - reinstatement is time barred and the office was abolished; pay for unexpired term is unjustified as the claimant resumed work at JKUAT
Under section 12(3) of the ELRC Act, three years had elapsed since the resignation, barring reinstatement. The respondent had been chartered as a fully fledged university, abolishing the Principal's position, following Professor Elijah Biama. Regarding the unexpired term, the separation agreement contained no provision for such payment, and the claimant had resumed employment as a Professor of Chemistry at JKUAT, following Ronald Sigey and Cyprian Kinoti M'muriungi.
Whether the claimant is entitled to accrued dues
Awarded salary to 2 May 2013, gratuity for period served, refund of transfer, medical claim and unpaid council allowances
The claimant was found entitled to salary of Kshs. 252,892.65 up to 2 May 2013, gratuity of Kshs. 454,004.00 for the period served per the contract, refund of Kshs. 389,703.00 transferred to the respondent, Kshs. 54,675.00 medical claim not specifically disputed, and Kshs. 240,000.00 unpaid council allowances supported by a circular. These were specific dues under the contract or undisputed claims, distinct from the refused claims for the unexpired term.
Whether the counterclaim heads are justified
Only the Council meeting allowance, mileage claim and pension heads succeed; the tax, staff amounts, notice pay and project payment heads fail
The claimant admitted in evidence the Council meeting allowance was irregularly paid; the mileage claim was found outside the terms of service; and the pension contributions were payable as gratuity not pension. Conversely, the tax claim was unexplained, the amounts paid to recruited staff were not shown recoverable from the claimant alone (other signatories were not disciplined), the resignation agreement superseded notice pay, and project payments were recoverable from contractors.
Legal principles established
#- Where parties to an employment contract agree to separate by a resignation agreement during a disciplinary process, they are bound by the terms of that separation and the disciplinary process is thereby frustrated/aborted; the court will not rewrite the parties' contract of separation.
- A resignation entered into voluntarily, with no established factor diminishing the employee's free will, is valid and precludes later claims of unfair termination.
Court orders
#- 1.Declaration that the separation by way of the resignation agreement superseded the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the claimant, which thereby aborted by parties' own agreement
- 2.The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 941,113.65 by 31.12.2018 failing which interest at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment
- 3.The respondent to pay 50% of the claimant's costs of the suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 (including section 12(3) on reinstatement)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Joseph Mungai Keriko v Kirinyaga University College [2018] KEELRC 633 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No 215 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/633/eng@2018-11-16
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.