Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutCause No. 208 of 2018 (with Causes No. 209, 210, 211, 213, 214, 215 and 218 of 2018)· [2018] KEELRC 565 (KLR)

Daniel Wang’ombe Maina & 7 others v Nyeri County Government & another [2018] KEELRC 565 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
22 November 2018
661 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Eight county workers lost their court case because Kenyan law requires them to appeal to the Public Service Commission before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent (Nyeri County Government & Another) raised a preliminary objection dated 6th July 2018 in eight consolidated employment causes (Nos. 208, 209, 210, 211, 213, 214, 215 and 218 of 2018), contending that the Employment and Labour Relations Court lacked jurisdiction because the Claimants were required, under Section 77 of the County Governments Act, to first appeal to the Public Service Commission. The Claimants opposed, relying on Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd on the definition of a preliminary objection as a pure point of law, and on John Mathu Ndung'u v B.O.M Ihwa Secondary School, where the same court held that an objection hangs in the air where no pleadings are filed. Nzioki wa Makau J noted that Section 77 provides for appeals to the Public Service Commission against decisions of County Public Service Boards, including decisions on remuneration and terms and conditions of service. Since the disputes concerned remuneration and the conversion of employment terms from contract to permanent and pensionable, they fell within the mandate of the Public Service Commission. The court followed the Court of Appeal's decision in Secretary, County Public Service Board & Another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille, which held that the statutory appellate mechanism is the appropriate first-instance forum for such grievances. The court found merit in the preliminary objections, struck out the suits, and made no order as to costs. Judgment dated and delivered at Nyeri on 22nd November 2018.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether Section 77 of the County Governments Act bars direct recourse to the ELRC for disputes over county public officers' remuneration and terms of service

Holding

Yes - such matters fall within the mandate of the Public Service Commission and the suits were struck out

Reasoning

The disputes concerned terms of service touching on remuneration and conversion of terms from contract to permanent and pensionable, which fall squarely within Section 77 of the County Governments Act. Relying on the Court of Appeal's decision in Secretary, County Public Service Board & Another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille, the court held that the statutory appellate mechanism before the PSC is the appropriate first-instance forum, and the preliminary objection therefore succeeded.

p. 2
02

The nature of a preliminary objection

Holding

A preliminary objection must be a pure point of law, assuming the facts pleaded by the other side are correct, per Mukisa Biscuit

Reasoning

The Claimants relied on Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd for the definition of a preliminary objection as a point of law pleaded or arising by clear implication from the pleadings, and on John Mathu Ndung'u v B.O.M Ihwa Secondary School where the same court held that where no pleadings are filed such an objection hangs in the air. The court nonetheless found merit in the objection.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statute provides a specialized dispute resolution mechanism, that mechanism must be exhausted before resort to court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suits struck out as the matters are for the Public Service Commission to handle in the first instance
  2. 2.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction; preliminary objection on exhaustion of the appeal mechanism under Section 77 of the County Governments Act, 2012

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Daniel Wang’ombe Maina & 7 others v Nyeri County Government & another [2018] KEELRC 565 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 208 of 2018 (with Causes No. 209, 210, 211, 213, 214, 215 and 218 of 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/565/eng@2018-11-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.