Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1378 of 2013· [2018] KEELRC 253 (KLR)

David Mulwa Mulinge v Laminates Furniture Limited [2018] KEELRC 253 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 December 2018
1,530 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan employers cannot cut your salary or change your job terms without consulting you — doing so counts as unfair termination.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent on 19th January 2011 as a Carpenter on a two-year renewable contract, sued for damages for unfair termination and terminal dues, alleging he was dismissed without notice. The Respondent admitted the employment relationship but contended that the Claimant was paid all his dues for 2011 before a Christmas vacation, that he reported back a day late in January 2012 and declined assigned work, amounting to desertion, and that a Labour officer found he had been paid and directed him to resume work if he wished. The court examined the contract and payslips, finding that the Claimant's gross salary of 15,600 for September to November 2011 was reduced to 8,869 in December 2011 with his status changed to casual, without any explanation or consultation. Relying on Section 10(5) of the Employment Act, which requires consultation and written notice of any change in contract terms, and the Western Excavating v Sharp constructive dismissal doctrine as adopted by the Court of Appeal, the court held that the unilateral alteration was a significant breach going to the root of the contract and that the Claimant was right to consider himself terminated without notice. The court found for the Claimant, awarding one month's salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 15,600) and 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination (Kshs. 187,200), totalling Kshs. 202,800, plus costs and interest at court rates. Claims for gratuity, tools allowance and off-duty pay were not awarded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the unilateral reduction of the Claimant's salary and change of his status to casual in December 2011 amounted to a termination of employment

Holding

Yes - the alteration without consultation amounted to constructive dismissal and the Claimant was right to treat himself as terminated without notice

Reasoning

The Claimant's payslips for September to November 2011 showed a gross salary of 15,600, but the December 2011 payslip exhibited by the Respondent showed a reduced figure of 8,869 with no explanation. Section 10(5) of the Employment Act requires the employer, where contract terms change, to consult the employee and notify him in writing. No consultation took place. Relying on the Western Excavating v Sharp constructive dismissal principle as applied by the Court of Appeal, the court held the conduct was a significant breach going to the root of the contract.

p. 2
02

What remedies flow from the constructive/unfair termination

Holding

One month's salary in lieu of notice and 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination, totalling Kshs. 202,800, plus costs and interest

Reasoning

Having found for the Claimant on the constructive dismissal claim, the court awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice at 15,600 and the maximum 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination under the Employment Act, being 12 x 15,600 = 187,200. The court also awarded costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment. Claims for gratuity, tools allowance and off-duty pay were not awarded as unproved or unanchored.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Unilateral alteration of essential contract terms without consultation with the employee amounts to constructive dismissal, entitling the employee to treat himself as discharged from further performance
  • Where any matter stipulated in the written statement of particulars changes, the employer must, in consultation with the employee, revise the contract and notify the employee of the change in writing

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Respondent to pay the Claimant 1 month's salary in lieu of notice of Kshs. 15,600
  2. 2.Respondent to pay the Claimant 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of Kshs. 187,200
  3. 3.Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 10(5), 35(6), 41, 43, 44, 45

Cases cited (1)

  • Western Excavating (ECC) LTD v Sharp
    [1978] 1 CR 222
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction (Employment Act, 2007; Employment and Labour Relations Court Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "David Mulwa Mulinge v Laminates Furniture Limited [2018] KEELRC 253 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Cause No. 1378 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/253/eng@2018-12-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.